← Huberman Lab

Optimizing Workspace for Productivity, Focus, & Creativity

第57期2022-01-31English会员内容
收听本集00:00 / 1:35:48
阅读设置
按你的习惯阅读
正文字号
下载播客精读
把这一篇,带走慢慢读

英文 · 精读 · 当前版本

下载功能还未开放

正文语言

精读 · 按主题梳理核心观点、论证与案例。

§01Arranging the room, not just the brain chemistry

The episode opens by changing the usual focus of productivity advice. The host, who introduces himself as Andrew Huberman, a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine, notes that most discussion of focus centers on dopamine, serotonin and caffeine. This conversation instead covers how people arrange their physical environment, and how they position themselves within it, to support focus, creativity and task switching at school, at work or in personal projects. Examples include where a screen sits relative to the eyes at a given time of day, whether to listen to music, and whether to use binaural beats and at what frequency. The stated goal is a checklist for optimizing a workspace on any budget.

The host says that none of the products or apps mentioned have a financial relationship with the show, and that listeners do not need them because the workspace can be arranged at zero cost. A preview of later material comes with a caveat. A free app delivers binaural beats at a frequency that peer-reviewed research has linked to better performance on certain types of learning and memory, but peer-reviewed research also shows it can diminish performance on other types of tasks.

The framing anecdote is about clutter. The host's undergraduate, graduate and postdoctoral advisors were all productive, focused scientists whose offices were "a complete disaster," piled with books and papers. The host dislikes clutter and finds it hard to focus around it, and observes that people vary widely on this point. The advisors' focus is attributed to one "single and yet fundamental variable of workspace optimization," but this section does not yet say what that variable is.

There's no right or wrong to this

The variables to be covered include vision, light, room noise, music and noise-canceling headphones. The host stresses portability. The aim is for advice to work at home or on the road, not to make people dependent on one perfect setup. In the host's words, "the last thing I would ever want to do is to create a situation where you find the optimal workspace and then you are a slave to that optimal workspace." Instead, listeners should have a short checklist of underlying variables to consult whenever they sit down to work.

§02Phase one: bright, overhead light for focused work

Light and vision come first. The host brings back a framework from an earlier episode on habits, which divides the 24-hour day into three phases. From waking until roughly six to nine hours later, the brain has high levels of dopamine and epinephrine, along with hormones such as cortisol, which produce a state of high alertness. The host says this holds whether or not someone uses caffeine, and acknowledges that some people feel most alert in the afternoon.

During this early phase, the advice is to light the workspace as brightly as is safely possible, preferably with overhead light, without glare or squinting. This adds to the host's frequent advice to get morning sunlight within 30 to 60 minutes of waking. The proposed reason overhead light matters is anatomical. Melanopsin ganglion cells are said to be concentrated in the lower half of the retina, view the upper visual field, and send projections to an area of the hypothalamus that creates alertness.

Phase one is described as the best time for analytic, detail-oriented work. Bright light is said to promote further release of dopamine and norepinephrine and "healthy amounts of cortisol." There is also a timing argument: a cortisol peak that comes too late in the day is described as associated with depression and insomnia.

The host describes their own routine. They get sunlight after waking, or turn on bright artificial lights if the sun is not out, and then work with all overhead lights on plus lights in front of them. Low-cost options include a desk lamp with overhead lights, or a ring light, which the host calls cost-effective, very bright, and rich in the blue light that stimulates melanopsin ganglion cells. The host uses an Artograph LightPad, a drawing device labeled 930 lux, mentions having no financial affiliation with the brand, and often leaves it on through phase one. The host repeats that it is not necessary and that any available artificial lights will work.

A window adds another distinction. Working near a window helps, and opening it helps more. The host says sunlight seen through a window is "50, 5-0, times less effective" than through an open one, mostly because the glass filters out blue wavelengths that are essential for this wake-up signal. The host notes that they do not have that option in their own workspace. The overall premise is that alertness is needed for precise, challenging work, and that the first seven to nine hours of the day are when neurochemistry best supports it.

§03Phases two and three: dimming, warmer light, and the all-nighter trade-off

From about nine to 16 hours after waking, the advice reverses toward lower light. The host says not to make the room dark, unless taking a brief nap, which they describe as fine if it does not interfere with nighttime sleep. Lights in front of the person are acceptable, but overhead lights are described as not optimal in this phase. The proposed reason is a shift away from the dopamine and norepinephrine that dominate early in the day toward serotonin and other neuromodulators, which the host links to creative and abstract thinking. Non-light tools for creative and analytic thinking are promised for later.

Screen brightness is treated as highly individual because retinal sensitivity varies. The host says people with darker eyes can generally tolerate more bright light, and describes their own green eyes as very light-sensitive, to the point of struggling to see across a reflective café table on a sunny day without sunglasses. The host adds that neither type is necessarily healthier or more advantageous. The one firm limit is comfort. In the host's words, "you never want to be in an environment where it's painful to maintain looking at whatever it is that you're looking at," because that could damage the eyes.

Around 4 or 5 p.m., about 12 to 14 hours after their usual 6 a.m. wake time, the host turns off the LED lightpad, switches to yellow lamps and dims the screen while keeping it readable. Some of the host's friends have converted their homes from blue light early in the day to red light late in the day. The host calls that optimal for productivity and sleep but notes that it costs money and is not feasible for many people.

Phase three covers roughly 17 to 24 hours after waking and is relevant to shift workers, students and people up against deadlines. The host admits to pulling five to 10 all-nighters a year for years, and still occasionally does, but does not recommend it. The advice is to use only as much light as the task requires. The host says brighter light at this hour severely depletes melatonin and shifts the circadian clock. In the host's words, someone working under bright light in the small hours is "effectively flying six hours to a different time zone, or at least that's what your body registers it as," which can disrupt sleep and metabolism.

The host explicitly flags a tension here. Staying awake in dim light is very hard, so someone who is struggling to stay awake may benefit from turning on every bright light. The choice is framed as a trade-off between protecting the circadian clock and getting the work done. The stated ideal remains sleeping at night and working during the day and afternoon.

好对话,值得读完整。

免费试读到此结束。开通书架会员,继续阅读全文,解锁中英对照与电子书下载。