← All-In

Nvidia smashes earnings, Arm walks the plank, M&A market, Vivek dominates GOP debate & more

第143期2023-08-25English会员内容
收听本集00:00 / 1:52:36
阅读设置
按你的习惯阅读
正文字号
下载播客精读
把这一篇,带走慢慢读

英文 · 精读 · 当前版本

下载功能还未开放

正文语言

精读 · 按主题梳理核心观点、论证与案例。

§01A tequila brand built on product quality, not price

After a light open about Friedberg's twenty-minute Zoom call with an astronaut on the ISS, the hosts turn to a possible All-In tequila. Calacanis reports two listener polls: one narrowly favored trying the product, and one on the most anyone had paid for a bottle. Chamath reads the numbers as a pricing problem rather than a popularity contest, arguing you only need enough buyers willing to pay the right price.

Chamath's core argument is that consumers over-weight packaging and under-weight the product, citing wine's many rating systems as proof that discernment eventually sorts quality. He wants any bottle to compete on taste, points to Komos as the first tequila given a 100-point score, and would err toward extreme product quality over price point. Friedberg backs this with his investment in 21 Seeds, a fruit-infused tequila later bought by Diageo, which he credits to time spent on product quality.

The hosts contrast two strategies: the Rock's accessible, affordable tequila, which Chamath says works because of a nearly 400-million follower base that enables a volume game, versus their own stance of standing for exceptional quality rather than price. Chamath widens the point to a consumption philosophy, arguing that people who work hard and find success should not feel ashamed to enjoy craftsmanship, and that telling others about high-quality, brand-off products meets a large latent demand.

You do not need a majority of people who wanna buy your tequila. You just need enough that are willing to pay the right price.

§02Nvidia's blowout quarter and why Chamath expects margins to compress

The hosts walk through Nvidia's results: Q2 revenue of $13.5 billion, up 101% year over year and 88% quarter over quarter, net income of roughly $6 billion up 843%, a market cap near $1.2 trillion, and a $25 billion buyback the board approved. Demand is broad, spanning big tech, startups buying H100s and A100s, sovereign wealth funds and traditional corporations.

Chamath frames the risk not as a knock on Nvidia but as a rule of capitalism: visible, outsized profits attract competitors and decay margins absent a monopoly. He lists emerging competition, from RISC-V and Tesla potentially open-sourcing or selling its FSD platform to Google's TPU, Amazon's silicon plans and Microsoft's FPGA bets, arguing these pull forward margin compression over time.

when the market observes that there's a company just printing enormous revenues and profits, they want to compete with them naturally to get their share of those revenues and profits.

好对话,值得读完整。

免费试读到此结束。开通书架会员,继续阅读全文,解锁中英对照与电子书下载。