← Lex Fridman

Leslie Kaelbling: Reinforcement Learning, Planning, and Robotics

第2019-03-12期2019-03-12English会员内容

嘉宾:Leslie Kaelbling

收听本集00:00 / 1:01:34
阅读设置
按你的习惯阅读
正文字号
下载播客精读
把这一篇,带走慢慢读

英文 · 精读 · 当前版本

下载功能还未开放

正文语言

精读 · 按主题梳理核心观点、论证与案例。

§01From philosophy to robots

Leslie Kaelbling is an MIT roboticist known for reinforcement learning, planning, and robot navigation, a winner of the IJCAI Computers and Thought Award and former editor-in-chief of JMLR. This opening frames the conversation.

Her excitement for AI began in high school reading Gödel, Escher, Bach, which exposed her to how complex behavior can be built from simple primitives and combination. Robots entered later: her first job at SRI's AI lab put her on a Shakey-successor robot, and getting that machine to do things is what drew her to robotics.

She did her Stanford bachelor's in philosophy because there was no CS undergraduate degree there at the time, and Stanford's symbolic-systems track — logic, model theory, and formal semantics of natural language — turned out to be ideal preparation for AI.

symbolic systems, which is logic, model, theory, formal semantics of natural language. And so that's actually a perfect preparation for work in AI and computer science.

Back then too few people pursued AI for it to be a named path; her graduating class of philosophy majors split roughly between computer science and law, with only one or two staying in philosophy.

On whether AI researchers should philosophize, she keeps to the formal corner closest to her work — belief, knowledge, denotation — and declares herself a materialist who sees no reason a robot couldn't be behaviorally indistinguishable from a human, while the zombie question of internal distinguishability is one she neither knows nor much cares about.

好对话,值得读完整。

免费试读到此结束。开通书架会员,继续阅读全文,解锁中英对照与电子书下载。