Aaron Smith-Levin: Scientology
嘉宾：Aaron Smith-Levin
全文文稿 · 按对话顺序保留完整内容，深入理解上下文。
本篇目录17 章节
§01Transcript · 00:00–08:43§02Transcript · 08:46–16:29§03Transcript · 16:32–23:52§04Transcript · 23:53–31:18§05Transcript · 31:20–38:05§06Transcript · 38:07–45:34§07Transcript · 45:39–53:48§08Transcript · 53:51–1:01:02§09Transcript · 1:01:04–1:09:15§10Transcript · 1:09:17–1:17:25§11Transcript · 1:17:27–1:25:47§12Transcript · 1:25:52–1:34:00§13Transcript · 1:34:05–1:41:24§14Transcript · 1:41:25–1:50:11§15Transcript · 1:50:16–1:57:47§16Transcript · 1:57:49–2:05:54§17Transcript · 2:05:58–2:13:00§01Transcript · 00:00–08:43
If Scientology was just getting auditing,
when you wanted, about the subjects you wanted,
and you could take it or leave it, that would be fine.
It's the fact that it's part and parcel
to this entire organization and this entire experience
that has, as a part of that experience,
taking everything from you, demanding everything from you,
controlling who you can speak with,
controlling who you can have relationships with,
who you have to erase from your life.
This is where, and it's hard to place one pinpoint on,
this is where Scientology goes wrong.
It's really hard to do that,
because the good parts of Scientology
and the bad parts of Scientology are all just Scientology.
The following is a conversation with Aaron Smith-Levin,
a former Scientologist raised in Scientology
and have worked in the organization full-time
for many years as a staff member and a C-Org member,
including the job of training Scientology auditors.
Today, he educates the public about Scientology
on his YouTube channel called Growing Up in Scientology.
This is the Lex Friedman Podcast.
To support it, please check out our sponsors
in the description.
And now, dear friends, here's Aaron Smith-Levin.
Let's do a full overview of Scientology,
its ideas, how it operates,
how it wields its power and influence.
And let's start at the very basics.
What is Scientology?
- Scientology is a belief system created by L. Ron Hubbard
that does fundamentally believe
that we are all immortal spiritual beings called thetans,
that we have native godlike potential,
that there is nothing more powerful
in the universe than a thetan.
So godlike is quite literal here.
And that through various decisions thetans have made,
they have fallen away from their native godlike power
to falling down to a state where most thetans
aren't even aware that they are thetans,
aren't even aware that they ever have lived before
or have these powers,
and that thetans are now in a state
where they're trapped in bodies, trapped here on Earth,
trapped in this prison of a physical universe,
trapped on this prison of a planet,
and that only Scientology can restore a thetan
to its native state.
- Are these multiple beings?
Like is there one thetan inside of me
that's trapped in this prison?
- Well, the thing would be you.
- The thing would be me.
- The thetan is you.
- But I'm presumably limited in some fundamental way.
So this thetan that is me is limited.
So there's like eight billion thetans on the planet.
- There's one primary thetan animating each body.
Later in Scientology you learn there's actually
like tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands
of like sick, unconscious, half-dead thetans stuck to you
that are now an additional cause of problems for you.
- Sure.
- But fundamentally at the lower levels,
the non-confidential levels,
there's just one thetan per body.
- I mean, it's an interesting idea.
I just would like to kind of explore the philosophy of that.
So there's a being that's all-powerful that's immortal,
and its projection, its manifestation on this Earth
is fundamentally limited.
And you're trying to, the process of Scientology
is the process of letting go of those limitations.
You know, that's an interesting idea.
I mean, a lot of religions have this kind of idea
that there's, not just religions,
but like we have the capacity as human beings
to achieve greatness in all kinds of ways.
And that's the question we have
with our cognitive abilities.
We start with an embryo and build up and into this organism
and like this world of opportunities before us,
what are we capable of?
And the idea that we're capable of almost anything
is a really powerful one.
And there's a lot of religions,
there's a lot of philosophies,
there's a lot of advice, self-help
that kind of explore those ideas.
And so, it seems like with Scientology,
the application of this religious philosophy
means that we're limited
and we have to break through those limitations.
And there's a process to break through those limitations.
- That would be correct.
So, what can make it challenging to adequately
and completely describe Scientology in the beginning
is what Scientologists believe actually changes
as they progress further into or further up in Scientology.
So, the explanation is that I've given it
is pretty consistent with what you would get
at the lowest levels, right?
You're a thetan, I'm a thetan, everyone's a thetan.
And we have a reactive mind.
L. Ron Hubbard would say the reactive mind
is a collection of these recordings,
mental recordings of any moments of pain and unconsciousness
you've ever had in your life.
It's like the subconscious mind.
It's always recording in moments of pain and unconsciousness
and that these recordings,
L. Ron Hubbard called them engrams.
Now, when L. Ron Hubbard first wrote Dianetics in 1950,
this was before Scientology came along
a couple years later, right?
So, in 1950, when he wrote Dianetics,
it wasn't a spiritual endeavor.
It was supposed to be a mental health,
a science of mental health.
So, as of that time, the earliest engram you could have
was the incident of birth, being born was an engram.
And technically, in Dianetics,
he said you could have prenatal engrams,
like when you're still in the womb.
But there was no concept of past lives
as of 1950 version of Dianetics, right?
And so, the idea there was that the reactive mind
is essentially a stimulus response mechanism
created through evolution millions of years ago
to protect the individual from things that would harm them.
In other words, things that would bring about
pain and unconsciousness.
So, you have these recordings of things that hurt you,
create pain and unconsciousness,
and in present time, these things will react upon you
in a way to cause you to avoid similar things
reacting upon you in a subconscious, unconscious way.
- So, the reactive mind protects you from the trauma
that is inside your subconscious mind.
- Yes, and the idea is we've now,
as human beings, evolved to a state
where it no longer serves us beneficially.
It only serves us negatively.
This was Hubbard's theory.
And he said, "So, you can get rid of these engrams
by basically recalling them and going over them
again and again using Dianetics auditing therapy.
And if you get back to the moment of birth
and erase the earliest engram,
all the other subsequent engrams on the chain would vanish."
- Oh, nice, so there's a chain.
- Early or similar, early or similar,
early or similar, early or similar, okay.
So, that gives you a pretty good understanding
of how L. Ron Hubbard thought of the mind
because that carries on,
has applicability later on in Scientology.
- I mean, that's a pretty powerful model of the mind.
I mean, Freud had similar conceptions
that a lot of our traumas are grounded in
poor formulation of sexuality
or imperfect formulation of sexuality,
you know, childhood, something like this.
And then we're trying to figure out the puzzle
of whatever we formed in early childhood.
- Right. - I mean, it's similar.
Similar kind of-- - It is similar.
Probably what Hubbard took it from.
In the early days of Dianetics,
before he decided psychiatry was evil,
he actually credited Sigmund Freud
with some of the shoulders he was standing on
in writing Dianetics.
- So, he still admired psychiatry at that time.
So, that's an interesting moment of Dianetics.
So, what else?
You mentioned Dianetics auditing was there too.
So, if we just, before Scientology,
what are the ideas that formed what we know as Dianetics?
- As I've just described, that is the fundamental.
- That is. - That is pretty much
the nuts and bolts of Dianetics.
- Was it applied?
Was it applied often?
- Oh yeah, no, that's what Dianetics in the early days
was all about, was just auditing.
Auditing is the process of the one-on-one counseling,
recall a moment of pain and unconsciousness,
run through the engram over and over and over again,
find something earlier, similar.
That is Dianetics auditing.
One of the main things that changed with Scientology
is that birth or prenatal engrams
were no longer the earliest engrams on the chain.
The idea is you have to get the earliest engram
on the chain for the later ones to blow, which is a race.
And so, but all of a sudden now,
with the addition of an immortal spiritual being
§02Transcript · 08:46–16:29
into the equation, well now the earliest incident
could be trillions of years ago
in other galaxies and universes.
- Other universes?
So, before the origin of this universe?
- Yes.
- Is there a model of physics integrated in any of this?
- No.
The model is you have the physical universe,
and then above that you have the theta universe.
So, we used the word thetan earlier.
So, in Scientology, they'll use the word theta.
Theta is just basically thetan power.
Thetans collectively.
So, Hubbard would say you have the theta universe,
which is senior to the physical universe,
and creates the physical universe.
And remember, I said native god-like potentials.
So, we're not talking about the god who created the Earth.
We're just, like Scientologists don't believe in a god,
but we'll get into that later.
We're talking about just creating universes.
Like, just think like Matrix.
Like, just, when I say creating a universe,
essentially just creating different thetan simulations.
- But it sounds like a little bit more
like the ideas of Plato,
which is there's these platonic forms,
there's abstract forms that are bigger, more general
than our particular reality here,
and those forms are used to construct the reality.
- Well, I grew up in a cult,
so I'm not familiar with the works of Plato.
(laughing)
- You can't use that as an excuse for everything.
I would like to, you know, non-jokingly steal a man the case
because a lot of philosophies, a lot of religions,
a lot of even scientific endeavors
are a little bit full of uncertainty.
You can call it bullshit, but you're on unsteady ground
because we're surrounded by mystery.
And you have to take these ideas somewhat seriously
and see where those ideas go wrong.
This happens with communism, this happens with capitalism.
These ideas sound beautiful in their ideal forms,
and then they somehow go wrong,
and some go more wrong than others.
And so I don't think, sort of, it's easy to
sort of caricature and make fun of the ideas.
I think if you take them seriously,
you'll start to understand, like,
when you're in it, it was serious.
It can be very convincing.
It's, you know, the devil is going
to be a charismatic person.
He's not going to be a caricature, a ridiculous person.
So that helps us understand which ideas
will sound appealing but will become dangerous.
- I totally agree.
In fact, it's one of the
thrusts I have on my channel,
is wanting to talk about Scientology in a way
that would actually resonate with current Scientologists,
not just resonate with former Scientologists.
I want people who are still in
to be able to hear how I talk about it and go,
"Wow, he's being really fair and really accurate.
"He's not just a hater," you know what I mean?
- If you look at the, you know,
let's take one of the worst places on Earth is North Korea.
You have Kim Jong-un.
And the reality is there's a lot of citizens of that nation
that deeply love the leader,
because they've grew up in that way.
And you, I mean, through fear,
through all kinds of manipulation,
through propaganda and so on,
they're not allowed to love members of their own family.
They're not allowed to have romantic love.
They're only allowed to have love for the leader.
And to reach those people,
you have to empathize with the fact that,
in their eyes, in some sense, this is a great man.
This is a god, a messianic figure.
You can't just make fun of the ridiculousness
of the situation that there's this pudgy person
waltzing around creating propaganda.
Like, how is this-- - With a funny haircut.
- With a funny haircut.
Like, it's so easy, and Hitler too,
to make fun of, to make a caricature of the person.
But this is a real person,
a real person that influenced the minds
of millions of people.
In the case of Hitler, you know,
tens of millions of people,
and created a huge amount of suffering.
Not because of the caricature version,
but because he was a charismatic leader.
He was somebody that people deeply, deeply loved.
And that just, over time, I mean,
with the abuse of any kind of ideology,
this happens over and over.
And so, yeah, it's interesting,
because Scientology is so close to the core
of what is America, because so many Americans
are involved with it.
So it's interesting to study the beauty
and the power of the ideas that underlie it,
and where things go wrong.
- Yeah.
And I'll just say, it's interesting to note,
you would never get a representative
of the Church of Scientology to sit down
and have a conversation with you,
and even be as fair and accurate about Scientology
as I'm going to be, which is noteworthy.
- Do you honestly, deeply believe that's the case?
There's not going to be a high-level official
that would sit down for a conversation?
- No.
- I disagree with you.
- I hope you're right.
- Because I think that, given the current dynamics
of what's happening, I think in order to say,
from their perspective, in order to save
the Church of Scientology, they have to be
transparent and authentic, basically still
mend their case, but better.
- You would think so.
- Well, we'll talk about the other ways you could do that,
which is through manipulation, through propaganda,
through controlled media, and all that kind of stuff.
- They paint themselves into a corner
of not being able to send a representative
out into the world to speak honestly about it,
because you're literally not allowed to.
So when faced, you know, if you're just sitting down
with an entertainment journalist,
a representative might be able to fudge their way
through an interview, but sitting down
for a long-form format interview with someone
who is gonna ask them about Zinu and the body thetans
and Leah Remini and Lisa McPherson, that's a no-go zone.
So I'm representing why it will never happen,
but shit, I would tune in for that interview.
I mean, I hope you do get someone.
- You don't think David Miscavige would sit down
for an interview?
- I would love to be wrong.
- You know, in general, journalists in these kinds
of situations can be, can attack in ways
that doesn't empathize and doesn't come from a place
of deep knowledge and understanding.
And I think it's possible to have serious conversations
with people like that in an empathetic way,
but it's also in a challenging way.
I think there's a huge amount of trust required.
And obviously for a very secretive organization,
the amount of trust, yes, might be too much required.
- Anyone over there, if they've done their homework knows,
you're gonna be as fair as anyone
in the world's going to be.
And yet, they're simply things they're not allowed
to talk about, and they're not even allowed to say,
I'm not allowed to talk about it.
- So that's a fundamental part of the church
of Scientology is the secrecy.
- Yeah.
- So that's where you're trained as you go up
through the ranks, is secrecy, secrecy.
- It's not even a matter of training.
It's that there's an entire, the entire upper half
of Scientology's bridge is simply confidential.
I mean, and I never even did those levels
when I was in Scientology.
I didn't learn what Scientologists actually believe
on those upper levels until after I got out of Scientology,
and I was fricking born and raised in it.
- Let's go there.
Let's go to your personal story.
So you've spent 30 years in Scientology.
- Yeah, I was four years old when my mom got in.
- And then about seven years ago, got out.
- Yeah.
- And you're on what, YouTube channel now?
And you're an educator.
- So I was four years old when my mom got introduced
to Scientology, and she got in really fast, really quick.
So, but I was 12 years old when I was taken out of school
and started officially full-time working for Scientology.
Okay, so in various capacities, I worked for them
from the ages of 12 to the age of 26.
- Yeah.
- Okay, so, and then I was 34 when I officially
parted ways with Scientology, which was really more
them officially parting ways with me,
but we can get into all that later.
That's just kinda how Scientology does it.
- And what do you do now in terms of Scientology?
§03Transcript · 16:32–23:52
- So now I run, growing up in Scientology,
the YouTube channel, but what I primarily do
is I help run an organization that helps people
who are escaping from Scientology.
I'm the vice president of the Aftermath Foundation.
And we created the foundation after the television show
Leah Remini, Scientology in the Aftermath.
And there was such an outpouring of support
from non-Scientologists all over the world.
What can we do to help people leave Scientology?
That we decided to create a foundation,
and it's been incredibly successful.
We've helped people escape from all regions
and echelons of Scientology.
We've accomplished, what we've accomplished
is far beyond what we actually envisioned
would be possible.
It's been a huge success.
- So we'll talk about the negative aspect,
the abuses of power, but let's just explore
the ideas a little bit more.
So the public facing three fundamental truths
of Scientology, maybe correct me if I'm wrong.
Man is an immortal spiritual being,
like we said with Thetans.
His experience extends well beyond a single lifetime,
so infinite memory backwards.
His capabilities are unlimited,
even if not presently realized.
The capabilities are unlimited.
- So when I say godlike, I really just mean,
you know, Thanos, like unlimited.
Scientologists don't believe in a god.
So when I say godlike, I just mean the most powerful entity,
the creator, the prime mover unmoved,
except we are all that.
You know, a Thetan in Scientology,
a Thetan has no position in space or time.
A Thetan does not actually exist in the physical universe.
It might choose to locate itself
in the physical universe, right?
And then forget that it made that decision
and then sort of get caught and trapped
in the physical universe.
But that once the Thetan is restored to its native powers,
everything you see here in the physical universe
is just a Thetan playing a game.
Like literally, we are in a simulation right now
of some Thetan.
So like physics doesn't have to make sense
when we're talking about it this way.
Like technically you're a Thetan, I'm a Thetan, we're here,
but this could also all just be another Thetan's game.
- So Thetan's all the way down.
- Yeah, it's just Thetan's everywhere,
Thetan's, it all comes down to the Thetan.
- Is there an idea of a god?
'Cause I read there's a kind of,
there is a sense of a supreme being.
Is that basically the Thetan that's at the core,
at the bottom of it all?
- Yes.
- Not defined, undefined.
- Correct.
Scientology has this concept of the dynamics,
how Ron Hubbard breaks life into eight different dynamics.
And the dynamic meaning a thrust towards survival.
So he would say, you know, the first dynamic is you yourself,
second dynamic is your family,
third dynamic is any other group
that you're a part of other than your family.
Fourth dynamic is all humankind.
The fifth dynamic is plant and animal life,
all non-human life.
Sixth dynamic is the physical world.
Seventh dynamic is sort of like spirituality,
collectively, Thetans, us as Thetans.
And the eighth dynamic,
Al Ron Hubbard says,
"Scientology doesn't deal with the eighth dynamic."
But we recognize that people have this idea
of a supreme being.
And so Scientology says,
"You can call the eighth dynamic the supreme being dynamic,
"but we call it infinity."
Just the allness of everything without having to define it.
And then they sort of do a little dance
and they're like, "Scientology,
"the purpose of Scientology is to get you to the point
"where you have your own understandings or realizations
"about the nature of the eighth dynamic.
"We don't tell you what you have to believe about that."
And technically speaking, that is true.
Technically speaking, that is true.
There's no point in Scientology where they sit you down
and say you're now required to revoke your belief
in a supreme being.
It's just that everything in Scientology
is inconsistent with a belief in the supreme being.
You can still find Scientologists
who, through cognitive dissonance,
will tell you they believe in a supreme being.
Mostly, they're lying to you.
- How is this inconsistent with a supreme being?
'Cause like, thetans--
- Because thetans have created everything, not God.
- Okay, so thetans created, they're also a creative force.
They're not just the force that runs everything.
- Right.
- But can't those be just the fingertips of a God?
- Sure.
The only way you could reconcile a supreme being
is if you say a single supreme being created all theta.
- Yeah.
- Like the spiritual Big Bang.
- Yep.
- But that's not what most people think
when they talk about God.
They're talking about a creator of--
- The physical universe.
- Yes.
- That there's no theta.
- Right.
I mean, even as I've described Scientology so far,
none of what I've said is something
I even subject to ridicule.
This is pretty common sense stuff, actually.
I mean, if you believe in spirituality or spirits at all,
there's nothing I've described so far that's crazy.
- Yeah.
- You know, believing in past lives
isn't particularly unique or special.
- Right.
- The fact that Scientology does this little dance
of pretending to believe in a God,
I mean, it's even like a PR line.
Scientology representatives will tell you
you can be a Christian and be a Scientologist.
Well, let me tell you what.
Christians don't believe in past lives
and lives on other galaxies and planets and universes.
And Scientology knows that.
Scientology knows you can't be a Christian
and be a Scientologist, but they will say that.
It's just an example of sort of the fundamental
baked in dishonesty.
- Because it's so important to Scientology
on the organization level to have tax exempt status,
I wonder, do you know the process of what it takes
to prove that an organization is a religion?
- While going through that process with the IRS,
for the second time, by the way,
Scientology actually had tax exemption in the early days
and the IRS pulled it, and then they got it back in 1993.
While going through that process again,
the IRS actually took issue with the fact
that Scientology was claiming you could be a Scientologist
and a member of another religion.
The IRS actually said, pump the brakes there.
If you're gonna say that,
we're gonna say you're not a religion.
And they actually put in writing to the IRS,
no, no, no, no, no, that's not what we meant.
That's not what we meant.
We meant in the beginning, you can be both,
but eventually, you just have to be a Scientologist.
- So you mentioned the eight dynamics,
but you also mentioned survival.
So that seems to be a core principle
that human existence is about survival.
Can you elaborate what is meant by survival?
Are we talking about the survival of the human species,
survival of the individual humans,
survival of the manifestation of thetans in human form?
What's survival?
- So it would be all of that,
because survival is the dominant force
across all the dynamics.
L. Ron Hubbard, it was either Dianetics
or Science of Survival.
He says he discovered the principle
upon which all life exists,
and that is all life, no matter what it is trying to do,
are you ready, Lex?
It's trying to survive.
- That's pretty powerful.
That's pretty powerful.
(Lex laughing)
- Is it?
- No, I gotta tell you, I gotta--
- You might get me back in, Lex.
- No, I'm not trying to get you back in.
I'm trying to get you to take seriously
the power of the ideas behind Scientology,
because I think those ideas are not bad ideas.
They resonate with a lot of ideas throughout philosophy,
throughout religions,
throughout the history of human civilization.
The interesting aspect is how it goes wrong.
- But here's the thing, Lex, here's the thing.
§04Transcript · 23:53–31:18
It is consistent with prior efforts or studies.
It's just that L. Ron Hubbard said
this was a watershed breakthrough
that was being discovered for the first time.
That's kind of what I'm mocking, really.
- Yeah, but you can mock Nietzsche for saying,
"Man is will to power."
You can mock Freud.
- But did he claim to be the first person to ever say it?
- Well, Nietzsche, he had a bit of an ego, so.
(Lex laughing)
And he's full of contradictions,
but I'm pretty sure the implied thing
is that he was the first to say it.
There's a lot of scientists.
There's one of the people I really admire,
Stephen Wolfram, who wrote a book
called "A New Kind of Science"
that explores complex systems and cellular automata
and these mathematical systems
that have been explored before,
but he boldly kind of defined,
"I am presenting to you a whole new way
"to look at the world."
And if you just set a little bit of the ego
behind that aside,
there's actually beautiful ideas in there.
They have, of course, been done before and explored before,
but sometimes people declare this is the coolest.
- That's the only thing I'm really mocking is he said,
"This discovery that life is trying to survive
"is greater than the discovery of fire."
Okay, I mean, it gets a little silly, but that's fine.
We can agree that the fact that life is trying to survive
has meaning and is meaningful and is valuable,
and it's true.
I mean, life is trying to survive.
- Also, there's a non-trivial definition
of what is life here.
So this idea of a thing that permeates through lifetimes,
through people, there's some fabric
that is bigger than the individual biological bags of meat.
That's a philosophically interesting idea.
Of course, if it's not grounded in a little bit more
physical reality, then it becomes a little too woo-woo.
And the way L. Ron Hubbard in Scientology
defines survival is very much intertwined
with how they define ethics.
Ethics, anything to be ethical is pro-survival.
To be unethical is counter-survival.
But we were talking about just the concept of the dynamics,
like what does survival refer to?
And it actually does refer to all of them,
but just keep in mind when it comes to the seventh dynamic,
Thetans collectively, involved in here is the idea
that a Thetan cannot die.
There's no such thing as killing a Thetan.
A Thetan can only survive.
And so, anyway, this concept of the dynamics
is one of the most fundamental and important concepts
in Scientology.
But because I mentioned that it also gets tied up
with ethics, and this probably speaks
to what you were just talking about,
is you can have the ideas and the concepts,
and you can have how do they go wrong,
because they hold that Scientology, applying Scientology,
getting people into Scientology,
is the key to basically saving
every spiritual being in existence.
When you're analyzing what is ethical,
it becomes whatever's good for Scientology
becomes by definition ethical,
because anything that's good for Scientology,
which is a third dynamic, is inherently good
for all the dynamics.
So that's where you get the ends justifying the means
to do anything possible, use any means necessary
to forward the aims of Scientology.
- That's kind of where a lot of Soviet implementation
of communism went wrong, is the ends justify the means.
The equality, the justice for the workers,
if we have to kill, murder, imprison, censor,
in the name of that, then it's for the greater good
in the long term to achieve the ideal of communism.
- In some respects, Scientology created
a near-perfect communist experiment in its C organization.
What is it, from everyone according to their ability
to each according to their need or something like that?
Scientology's C organization is damn near
a perfect communist experiment.
Coming from someone who doesn't necessarily know
what a perfect communist experiment really is,
'cause I grew up in a cult, Lex.
- You can't keep using it as an excuse.
- It's a funny tagline I use in my videos.
- I like it.
- But it is interesting that an organization
that is so hyper-capitalist and so money-hungry
and is known to be very wealthy,
at its core is run by this group of C org members
that live a communist lifestyle.
- We're gonna jump around.
Let's go, what is C org?
What is C organization?
What is this organization?
- The C organization is the most dedicated version,
the most dedicated brand of Scientologists.
So there's three echelons of Scientologists.
There's public, who just live normal lives
in the real world and they pay
to do Scientology courses and auditing.
Then there's staff members, who also live in the real world,
but work on two-and-a-half-year contracts
or five-year contracts at their local Scientology
organization, and then once they finish their contract,
their debt is paid or whatever.
And then there's the C org members.
These are the guys who sign the billion-year contracts.
They don't have lives in the outside world.
They don't own property.
They live in Scientology-provided housing.
They eat in Scientology-run cafeterias.
- Is there an actual contract that says a billion years?
- It's symbolic, but yes.
Like, no, it's not a legally enforceable contract.
(laughing)
They haven't succeeded in enforcing it
in any subsequent lifetimes yet.
- Marriage contracts should be like that.
A billion years.
'Cause not until death do us part,
but a billion years, it really makes it very concrete
of what you're signing up for.
- Yeah, those are the billion-year guys.
You hear a lot about the billion-year contract,
the billion-year contract.
That's the C org.
And all of Scientology management,
international management, middle management,
continental management, and even some lower-level
service orgs, are composed 100% of C org members.
You're not allowed to marry or date someone
who's not in the C org.
You're also not allowed to have children.
- With anybody outside of C org or in general,
you're not allowed to have children?
- C org members are not allowed to have children
unless they leave the C org.
If you're expected to have an abortion
and stay in the C org, 'cause it's the greatest good
for Scientology, if you accidentally get pregnant.
- Interesting, 'cause it distracts
from the focus of the work.
- Yeah.
- What about sexual relations?
- Only once married.
But that's why people get married after like three days.
You're like, "Hey, you, you look."
- You look all right, let's get married.
- Are you allowed to have divorce?
- Yeah, you get divorced a lot in the C org.
I've known people who get married and divorced
three times by the age of 25.
- Oh, wow.
- Because in the C org, getting married
is practically like dating.
- Right.
- Also, unless you're married, you're living in dorms
with a bunch of other people.
So in order to get your own room,
you also have to get married.
So there's many benefits.
- Oh, wow, okay.
So you mentioned communism.
In which way, 'cause is there a hierarchy inside C org?
Is there a redistribution of influence,
position, money, power inside C org?
- Everyone in the C org makes $50 a week.
Everybody, except David Miscavige.
- Right.
- And some posts might have a cash bonus incentive structure,
but fundamentally their pay is $50 a week.
So even the head of a big Scientology organization,
is getting 50 bucks a week.
- Are celebrities also part of C org or not usually?
So this is really the management layer.
So what's the idea behind $50 a week?
Is that basically live a humble life?
- They don't have to give you anything at all.
It's just, oh, you mean like,
what's the idea behind not paying?
- Yeah, basically not paying.
- Everything you need is already being provided for you.
You're not here for the money.
You're working all the time anyway.
It's not like you don't have days off.
I mean, you're working all the time.
There's no concept of the weekends.
There's no, oh, thank God it's Friday.
§05Transcript · 31:20–38:05
Friday is just another day.
- And how are the position, the tasks,
the jobs allocated within the C org?
- What do you mean?
- Like what kind of tasks you're doing?
What kind of stuff you're doing?
- It's very similar to just any other business,
as far as you can have your human resources,
you can have your sales, you can have your accounting,
your operations, your quality control.
It's just that in Scientology,
your operations is delivering courses and auditing.
So your operations and your quality control
where most of the activity occurs
as far as delivering Scientology.
And then you've got your, you'd call it business development,
but that's just bringing in new members, right?
So the function of Scientology's organization
is very comparable to a normal business
in the normal world.
- So let's talk about the products of this business,
auditing and courses.
So what's auditing?
- So auditing is, so we described earlier,
Dianetics auditing, Scientology auditing
is very similar to that.
- So at first glance, it looks like psychotherapy,
a kind of therapy.
- All Scientology auditing is going to look like that.
It's one-on-one talk therapy.
You're in a room by yourselves, no distraction, no noise.
- One-on-one?
- Yeah.
- So like this?
- Yeah, and in Scientology,
they have what's called an E-meter.
- Right.
- Almost all auditing employs the use of an E-meter.
- What's an E-meter?
- So an E-meter is a device that just measures
the resistance to a small electrical flow,
except Scientologists believe that this E-meter
can be used to simply direct the progress
of an auditing session, to determine whether
the auditing has reached a good, satisfactory conclusion.
All auditing sessions have to end
on a satisfactory conclusion.
Like, that's the job of the auditor.
You don't just, it's not like,
sorry, the session sucked, see you next week.
It's not like that.
Every auditing session has to end on a positive note,
and if it doesn't, there's corrections to be made.
So the E-meter--
- What does it look like visually?
- Oh, you can pull it up.
Pull up mark eight, E-meter mark eight.
So there's a few dials.
- Yeah.
- There's basic information about time and duration,
I'm presuming, and then a dial
that just goes zero to something.
- Okay, so let's say that the meter's in front of me
and you're the one holding the cans.
- I'm holding the cans, so you're doing the auditing of me.
- Yeah. - Okay.
I'm holding the cans.
- No, literally, in the beginning of an auditing session,
when you're calibrating the sensitivity of the E-meter,
you do a can squeeze.
So I go, squeeze the cans, please.
- Okay, so I'm just like squeezing the cans.
- And I'm just changing the sensitivity,
'cause when you squeeze the cans,
I wanna get about a one third of a dial drop on the needle.
The idea is, if the needle's too sensitive,
then every time you shift around in your chair,
the needle's gonna bounce all over the place.
So you're trying to set the sensitivity of this thing.
And that's all, the knob there on the bottom to the left,
that's the sensitivity knob.
And that determines just how sensitive
the needle's gonna be.
And the bigger dial is called the tone arm,
and that is changing, I wanna say voltage or current,
but I'm not intending, I'm gonna get
one of those words is wrong, right?
- But it is a real device.
- It's a real device.
- That you can actually calibrate to probably,
you know, get an outcome that you want.
- Yeah, so here's even how just how a Scientology auditor
believes it works.
You're holding the cans, there's a tiny little battery
in that E-meter that's sending,
you're completing the circuit
when you pick up the cans, right?
So you got a little thing going there,
and that needle will respond to your physical movement,
but that's not what we want.
We want you to sit the hell still
so that we can read this thing
when I'm asking you questions, okay?
- So you're sitting there still, very still.
- As still as you can, comfortable, right?
And I'm gonna go, is there something
you're withholding from me?
And what I'm looking for is right when I say
at the end of me, I'm looking for the needle
to dip to the right.
- Having a needle, even if it's kind of random,
can really be like a catalyst for conversation.
- That's what it's used for,
except it's an enforced conversation.
So I'll give you a really good example of this.
So you're holding the cans.
Say, is there anything you're withholding from me?
And I get an instant read.
And I go, is there anything you're withholding from me?
You're gonna go, I don't think so.
- And I don't see the needle.
- No, you don't see the needle.
I go, well, what did you think of
when I asked you the question?
Now, if you've already had a lot of auditing,
you know how this goes.
It means I got an instant read,
and we're not going to move on
until this question gets resolved.
Okay, so you're gonna go,
I don't know what I was thinking of.
And then I'm gonna be like, you know,
take a look and I'll help you out here.
I'll try to steer you.
Okay, so I'm looking to get roughly the same read
while you're thinking about whatever.
I'm going, what was that?
What was that right there?
- And you can start digging to what?
You can start-
- I just want an answer to the question.
Okay.
- And I can go to memory.
- Yeah, and you can give me any answer you want.
There's no way for me to know
if you're giving me the right answer,
but I want you to give me something.
- Yeah.
- If you say you can't give me anything,
I'm gonna keep using the emulator
until you give me something.
- Yeah.
- Okay, so let's say you give me something.
I'm gonna get all the details about that.
And until like time, place, form, and event,
I wanna know everything that happened.
I wanna know all the details.
And by the way, I'm writing all this down.
So I'm taking notes of everything you're telling me
that it's a bad thing that you did
that you haven't told me about.
Okay, so I'm keeping notes.
When you represent to me
that you've told me everything there is to tell,
I'm looking for the needle
to give like a smooth back and forth motion like this.
And Scientology calls that a floating needle.
That means in Scientology land, we're done with that.
So now I might go back to check the question.
Okay, good, I'll check the question again.
Is there anything you're withholding from me?
Ooh, if I get another read,
we gotta go through the process again.
Okay, if you tell me I've told you everything
and I don't get a floating needle,
I've gotta go, okay, is there an earlier similar thing?
Have you basically done an earlier similar thing?
Is there an earlier similar time
you haven't told someone something?
Or is there an earlier similar thing
that you did to the thing that you just told me?
We're gonna keep going earlier similar,
earlier similar, earlier similar
until I get a floating needle.
And that's where, explaining it this way,
you can see how no matter what
the specific auditing session happens to be about,
there's still the potential in any auditing session
that you're going into past lives.
Just because you have to go earlier similar
until you get a floating needle.
Okay, now here's how Scientologists think
the e-meter actually works.
Meaning, why does the e-meter work?
So we talked before about these mental pictures, right?
These recordings, okay?
Well, we spoke about engrams,
just recordings of pain and unconsciousness.
Well, Scientology would hold the bad recordings
aren't the only recordings that you have.
§06Transcript · 38:07–45:34
Those are just the recordings in your reactive mind.
You also have an analytical mind,
which is just your conscious memory,
conscious recording of everything from present time
to the last 76 trillion years.
And Hubbard would say that these memories
are actually a perfectly detailed recording.
And he says like 56 perceptions or something.
And that it's perfect.
And you can access that information,
you just have trouble doing so.
Okay, so he says that these recordings,
these mental pictures have actual electrical charge and mass.
Now you asked before,
is there any actual physics in this?
I don't know, where are you supposed to store
the pictures of your last 76 trillion years
that have charge and mass?
I don't see it, but Hubbard says it's there, okay.
So he says that these things have mass.
And when you recall them or put attention on them,
you create an electrical flow,
which maybe through magnetic fields or whatever,
impinges upon the electrical flow of the e-meter
and it shows up as a read on the needle.
That's how Scientologists believe
that's why the needle reads.
Now cynics would say the needle only reads
on palm sweat and movement.
Well I know that's not true.
I can't tell you everything the needle does read on,
but I can tell you it's not just
moving your hands and sweaty hands.
- It does correlate to thoughts probably.
- Some way, somehow.
- 'Cause if it didn't correlate to thoughts,
then this process would be way too inefficient.
'Cause there's going to be a bunch of people
who are just not, you're not gonna get the,
what is it called, the floating needle.
Like no matter what.
- I can't explain to you how you get a floating needle,
but it sure as hell isn't hand sweat
and it sure as hell isn't squeezing the cans.
- Right, so you eventually,
most people will get to the floating needle.
And somehow-- - You get floating needles.
- There's like a feed,
there probably is a feedback mechanism
that you're, each person realizes
how their mind and body,
'cause you want a resolution, right?
It's probably-- - You want your needle to float.
- For both people. - Yes.
- And it's probably a great experience
when you're like, yes, it's a gamified feeling, right?
- Well when you're training on how to use the e-meter,
there are drills where you practice
generating with your mind various needle reactions.
So there is a drill where you sit there
and you consciously try to create a floating needle
by recalling happy thoughts.
You go to your happy place,
and at the end of every auditing session,
you actually have to go to a third party,
sit down in front of an e-meter
and verify that your needle's floating.
- Nice. - Every single auditing session
not only has to end on a floating needle,
but then you have to go to someone else
and have the floating needle verified.
Any Scientologist who's a seasoned recipient of auditing
knows how to make their needle float at the examiner.
(laughing)
- But I gotta be honest though,
this process, again, sorry to be sort of going there,
but it feels like this is a very
rigorous talk therapy session.
Is there good aspects to this?
- Sure.
A lot of people find auditing very helpful.
I mean, I've heard some describe it
as quite thoroughly addictive.
Me personally, I never enjoyed getting auditing.
That's probably more a function of having been raised in it,
and it was never something I wanted to do.
It was something that was forced on me as a child,
and also I was never, I don't like talking
about private secret stuff.
You kind of have to want to be an open book
to honestly and thoroughly participate
in an auditing session.
- 'Cause there's not necessarily a belief
that this is gonna be private.
- There's no expectation of privacy,
but there's no expectation that your stuff's
gonna be leaked for blackmail either.
- You kind of--
- You trust the people in the organization.
- Even despite rumors and stuff like that,
but the rumors are coming from people
that are lying to you, essentially.
- If you're a Scientologist, and you're participating
in an auditing session, you know that anyone
in the organization has the ability
to know the stuff that you talk.
It's not like, oh my God, I'm only telling my auditor
'cause I think no one's ever gonna know.
You know that people know,
but you also trust the organization.
- How quickly does it go to past memories?
- For people who are seasoned,
they actually like going past life.
I hated it.
I would make sure, I was really good
at making my needle float.
I didn't want to have some auditor,
'cause I never believed in the past life memories.
So I didn't want to be in that impassable,
reach an impasse in an auditing session
where I was being asked for something I couldn't provide,
'cause I knew this auditing session
has to end on a good point.
But Scientologists enjoy, for the most part,
they call it whole track.
Whole track is past life, going whole track.
Your time track, they call it the time track,
is your whole memory,
but whole track refers to anything past life.
So going whole track or deep whole track with high reality,
meaning it's not like, oh, I have a fuzzy memory
and I'm not sure if it's real.
Like your real seasoned Scientologists are like,
oh yeah, I was on this planet
and this time circling this star
and this is what I was eating for breakfast.
- Fascinating.
Before the origin of life on Earth,
or before, so billions of years ago,
on a distant planet where you were eating for breakfast.
- Or other universes.
- I wonder if there's a nice shortcut
to sneak up to actual trauma that happened to you
as a therapy device.
I just, so putting Scientology aside,
I just am thinking about as a technique for therapy,
discussing, basically, you know, some people have trauma
and one of the things you do with therapy
is like bring the trauma to the surface.
That's the stuff that happened to you in childhood.
Maybe it's a more convenient thing to do
to kind of map that indirectly onto a fictitious telling
of what happened to you,
something like that trauma on a distant planet elsewhere.
Could be a nice way to sneak up to it.
- Yeah, and it goes both flows there,
not just things that have happened to you,
but things that you've done.
So, you know, you could be being asked for, you know,
you'd be going back to, I wiped out a civilization.
I committed genocide on this race on this planet.
- Oh wow.
- Oh yeah.
- So you can actually take on a whole new guilt.
- Oh yeah.
- So, okay, all right.
You might actually take on a lot more guilt than I go of.
'Cause if you feel like that self-critical aspect
of the brain, boy, 'cause my brain is really self-critical.
So I could see myself manufacturing,
if I was forced to over time,
some kind of story where I did genocide
a whole population of like Pluto or something
at a distant, somewhere in Alpha Centauri.
- Yeah, so I mean.
- And now I walk around with that guilt.
Wait, I'm actually a horrible person.
- So imagine though, if you had not only are you looking at,
you know, if someone's being self-critical,
trying to identify destructive patterns of behavior
in your present life, but what if you really internalize
the fact that I haven't only been this way for 40 years.
I've been this way for 40 trillion years.
- Yeah.
- But Scientology would argue that as a Thetan,
you're inherently good.
All Thetans are basically good.
So the goal of the auditing procedure there
would be essentially to figure out, find the moment,
find what it was that caused you to make that shift
as a being to dramatize evil intentions and stuff like that.
So even if you're going whole track,
looking at all the horrible things you've done,
the goal is to find like,
well, what happened just prior to that?
What was like the prior confusion?
And what did you misunderstand just before that and whatnot?
So the goal is basically,
so Scientologists after a lot of auditing
are also convinced that they have fixed the reason
§07Transcript · 45:39–53:48
for any non-optimum conduct.
- And underlying this is a belief
that at the core, we're all good.
- Yes.
- There's a lot of really powerful ideas in Scientology,
which is so interesting that it goes wrong.
Okay, what about the training you mentioned,
the training of the auditor?
That's really interesting.
So how lengthy is that process?
- It can take years.
I mean, one of that question I wanna ask is,
are people in Sea Org, like as an auditor,
do you believe everything?
How much, is there a crisis of faith that creeps in?
In religion, you have a crisis of faith
when you start to wonder like, does God even exist?
So in this case, how often do you start to doubt
that some of the core beliefs of Scientology are false?
- Scientology would say that Scientology
is not about beliefs.
It's about application of the techniques
of Scientology auditing to improve someone's
spiritual awareness and ability.
So the belief level of Scientology
is pretty much the stuff we've already discussed.
- The effectiveness of the auditing process.
- So the effectiveness of the auditing process,
this is one of the things Hubbard says,
is that standard tech, Scientology, they call it the tech,
the technology of how to deliver auditing,
standard tech, works 100% of the time
when applied 100% correctly.
Well, that's kind of unfalsifiable, right?
'Cause anytime it doesn't work--
- It wasn't applied correctly.
- Exactly.
That's a nice little escape hatch
to pull on having a crisis of faith.
It didn't work, well, then obviously
it wasn't applied correctly.
That's where quality control comes in.
Their job is to nitpick, and you can always find
one thing that wasn't done correctly.
- Communism didn't work because
it wasn't implemented correctly.
It's always an escape hatch with ideologies.
- That's right, that's right.
I would probably argue that auditors
are not in a position of having many crisis of faith,
'cause actually they're usually seeing people,
for the most part, improve in some ways
through the process of auditing.
Now, auditing can create like a state
of somewhat of a euphoric state.
You feel great, you're just blown out of your head.
You feel on top of the world.
I've had that in some of my auditing.
- As an auditor, sorry?
- No, as a person receiving auditing.
And so my point is, as an auditor doing a lot of auditing,
you're gonna have someone in front of you
called the pre-clear, is the person in front of you
who's getting the auditing, called the PC or the pre-clear.
They see over and over and over again
these PCs having these sort of euphoric states
and floating needles, and I feel great and fantastic.
No, thanks, you saved my life, and da-da-da-da-da.
I've always said, if people didn't find
Scientology helpful, nobody would ever stay in Scientology.
And so auditors are pretty much the ones
doing the heavy lifting of what it even means
to be a Scientologist.
Those guys aren't the ones that you end up
having crisis of faith.
I mean, doing Scientology auditing,
it doesn't require that you just have faith
that you believe something.
You just have to go through these motions.
And Scientologists, one of the reasons Scientologists
think this is all scientific is 'cause it's like,
I don't care if you believe why this works.
I care how you feel at the end of an auditing session.
- And empirically speaking, anecdotal data
is it actually seems to improve people's lives
within the context, so taking the outside world
out of it, within this particular organization,
you're actually measurably seeing improvement.
- Yes.
- Is that to some degree real?
Because if you look at a book like Animal Farm,
where the pigs start to rule the other animals,
and over time, the life of the animals
gets worse and worse and worse,
while the pigs keep saying that it's actually
getting better and better and better.
Again, communism, same thing.
The rationing is getting worse and worse and worse,
less and less food, but there's constant reporting
that there's more and more food.
We're winning, hashtag.
- I would argue that what you've just described
could be an identical description of what it feels like
and what it means to go up,
"Scientology's Breakthrough to Total Freedom."
You are reinforcing to yourself that everything
is getting better and better and better,
and you'd be like, you don't spend time
with your family anymore, you're broke,
even though you make a lot of money,
you're always stressed, you're at the beck and call
of these people who seem to run your lives.
How a Scientologist feels about their own life is,
it's very interesting to compare that
to how that person's life looks
to their non-Scientology family members.
I get contacted by a lot of people
who've never been in Scientology,
but they're like, "I got a family member who's really deep,
"and can you help me understand some things?
"Why is this person's life like this?
"Why is this person's life like this?"
So, I don't wanna say that Scientologists
do not actually, I don't wanna say,
"Oh, it's all in their heads,
"they think they're being helped, but they're really not."
That doesn't feel honest, you know?
But it's this thing where if Scientology
was just getting auditing when you wanted,
about the subjects you wanted,
and you could take it or leave it, that would be fine.
It's the fact that it's part and parcel
to this entire organization and this entire experience
that has, as a part of that experience,
taking everything from you, demanding everything from you,
controlling who you can speak with,
controlling who you can have relationships with,
who you have to erase from your life.
This is where, and it's hard to place one pinpoint on,
this is where Scientology goes wrong.
It's really hard to do that,
because the good parts of Scientology
and the bad parts of Scientology are all just Scientology.
- Yeah, so there's definition of what's bad for you,
and it's probably in the beginning is bad for you.
This almost just sounds like a template
of a toxic relationship.
There's a bunch of stuff in this world
that is just not good for you,
so the authoritarian says, "I'm just protecting you
"by blocking you off from those negative things."
And they are probably negative things,
but then this freedom starts closing in
to where you can't no longer speak freely,
think freely, act freely.
And there's some, I mean, that's why power corrupts,
and absolute power corrupts absolutely.
The person doing the controlling
actually starts getting that dopamine rush
of the controller that's exciting.
It's a vicious negative cycle.
So you start out, it starts out good,
'cause you're trying to do good for the person,
but then it somehow goes to shit.
So what are the aspects that are often controlled
about a person who's in Scientology, especially Sea Org?
- Well, information control, access to the internet,
access to any information critical of Scientology.
- Is some internet access allowed?
- Public Scientologists has no restrictions
to their access to the internet.
They're just not allowed to read
anything critical of Scientology.
- Oh, okay, so they're supposed to self-control
what they read or not.
And what's the explanation?
Is it always assumed that anything critical
of Scientology is a lie?
- They really push this thing that
unless you've been in a Scientology organization yourself,
or unless you've actually been a Scientologist,
you couldn't possibly know the truth about Scientology.
If you're only getting information
from people who aren't members or former members,
then you couldn't possibly be getting
the correct information.
Now, they don't realize the math there doesn't make sense.
If you can find out the true information
by becoming and being a Scientologist,
then that means you can get the correct information
from a former Scientologist,
because they traveled that path
and they got the correct information.
So they still create this,
or they try to create this unfalsifiable loop,
where unless you are personally doing it,
you don't have correct information.
And you go, "Well, what about the people
who did personally do it, got the correct information,
left, and are now sharing that with others?"
§08Transcript · 53:51–1:01:02
Well, no, those are lies.
Well, okay, so just anything you don't like is a lie then.
You go, "Yeah, pretty much, that's kind of how it works."
- So what about the control of negative information
on the internet?
What, like, the actual operations?
I've, you know, preparing, I should admit,
I don't know too much about Scientology.
I was doing a bunch of reading,
and the Wikipedia page on Scientology,
interestingly enough, is not that negative
about Scientology.
So, like, it made me ask,
you have to be a little bit careful
how you consume stuff from Wikipedia.
You have to consider, because money can buy things there,
there's certain special interests and so on.
But, like, it made me wonder,
like, with a lot of controversial topics,
what is true, and where do I look,
where do I go for truth?
So, like, how much sort of deliberate action is there
to control what is true on the internet by Scientology?
- Well, these days, they've pretty much, I think,
thrown in the towel, but--
- They have.
- The Scientology middle management
was editing Wikipedia so often from IP addresses
that were traced back to the Scientology buildings
that Wikipedia locked them out from any IP addresses
associated with Scientology from being able to edit it.
It's like, the Scientology was so infatuated
with trying to control the information,
and in the early days of the internet,
they had a certain degree of success with that.
It's just hopeless these days.
- The scale, the scale's not there,
but actually, I'm very surprised how bot farms,
how effective that can be at a very small scale.
If you just pay 100 people to spread narratives.
But the reason that's effective
is you can kind of create conspiracy theories
that create chaos, and nobody knows what is true.
That bot farms can do.
But actually really nicely controlling a narrative is hard.
So to create chaos, it's easier to do.
To basically say, do PR control is very hard.
Yeah, so especially on the internet,
especially when the critical eye is there.
The internet can smell bullshit,
which is one of the really, really powerful things
about the internet.
And I gotta tell you, it's one of the reasons
I do my YouTube channel.
It's one of the reasons I decided to upload every day.
I've uploaded every day for the last six months.
I just wanted there to be a nonstop flow of information
of any kind and any variety,
as long as it's fair and balanced,
intelligent, interesting, that Scientologists
who stumble upon the internet will go,
oh look, someone's talking about my thing.
Let's see what they got going on.
And I know this guy.
The fact that Scientology crushes so much information,
before YouTube, before,
I have the only big Scientology channel.
And that only got big in the last six months.
Okay, so before that, there were channels, there was things.
But it's almost like, it took a lot of,
people felt like it took a lot of bravery and courage
to say something on the internet about Scientology.
And so people would pop up,
and there weren't very many voices.
And I was like, I want this to be prolific.
I want to be prolific.
I want to have 30 or 40 other channels being prolific
so that Scientology couldn't possibly
successfully control the narrative about it.
- Have you been personally attacked?
- AaronSmith11.com is a website
created by the Church of Scientology.
Have you seen it?
- No, what kind of content is on there?
- Oh, Aaron's abusive father and a horrible husband
and the worst staff member we've ever had.
Oh, I openly talk about it,
because I think the fact that Scientology
even does things like that is fucking hilarious.
And anything they try to do to me,
the way I think about it is,
you know you're just giving me an opportunity
to turn the mirror back on you
and show everyone how horrible you are.
- Does it stick?
- No.
- So you find that there is ineffective.
- It's completely ineffective.
They're so over the top.
And I'll tell you how the website even came into being.
So I was on the first season
of Leah Remini's Scientology in the Aftermath.
Every single person who participated in that show
got a website.
(laughing)
It's just that everyone else's website is like,
whoismarkhedley.com.
Whoismikerender.com.
Well I bought whoisarinsmithlevin.com,
but I was too stupid to buy,
I didn't buy arinsmithlevin.com.
So I'm actually the only one
who has a website in their name.
- Oh, nice.
- Yeah.
And I'm like, I could probably get a lawyer
to get it back for me, but I'm like, why?
I want everyone to see what a nasty, petty,
disgusting organization that this is.
And nobody believes anything Scientology says anyway.
- Does the general public know
that it comes from Scientology?
- Pull it up.
Right on the bottom, copyright 2000 whatever,
Church of Scientology International.
Like they didn't even try to hide it.
- Arinsmithlevin.com.
- Yeah.
- A man with no moral compass.
- Arinsmith, who is he really?
Arinsmith Levin, a man with no moral compass.
Read about Arinsmith Levin,
an angry man spreading hate from the internet's shadows.
Open mouth shot.
And you're saying like, but wow, there's testimonies.
Oh, there's videos from former coworkers.
- The slightest thing just sets him off
and he just goes totally nuts.
Well, that one is true.
I didn't understand why you slapped me before the interview.
I felt that.
- They've got links to everyone else's website
on the bottom, it's so funny.
- Okay, the irony.
- 2021 Church of Scientology International,
all rights reserved.
Here's an example of just Scientology's
complete lack of self-awareness.
So me and Mike Rinder, we went half season
on like a house flip project, right?
- Wait, Mike Rinder?
- You know Mike Rinder.
- Do I?
(laughing)
You gave me a bobblehead of the guy.
I don't know him, I just,
I would like to talk to him about him,
but there's a very fine gentleman here with a bobblehead.
- The reason we created the bobblehead
is because on Mike Rinder's hate site,
Scientology created a gif or a gif.
How do you say it, what's the right way to say it?
- The correct way is gif.
- Gif, good.
Scientology created a gif of Mike Rinder as a bobblehead.
It was an insult, like, oh, all he does
is sit next to Leah Remedy and go,
yes, Leah, yes, Leah.
And so they made a gif of him with a bobblehead.
So we were like, we're gonna make Mike Rinder bobbleheads
and we're gonna sell them on the spshop.com
to raise money for the Aftermath Foundation.
- I love it.
- Yeah, and now that I--
- So go out and buy.
- Yeah, go to the spshop.com
and get yourself a Mike Rinder bobblehead.
Now look, now that my profile's getting a little higher,
this head was made to bobble.
Like this smooth, shiny head needs its own bobblehead now.
- It does, 100% does.
- I can't believe it doesn't exist.
So, but let me show you.
So here's what's happening here.
We just hired some day laborers off of what,
like Craigslist or something.
So what Scientology did was they had a private investigator
stake out the House Flip Project.
They were clearly running license plates
of anyone who visited the property
because otherwise how would they find out
the laborers' names, do background checks on them
to find out they had criminal records?
And they published this as if it's gonna
reflect negatively on me.
Oh, we hired someone to do work who had a criminal record?
Who gives a shit?
Do you know one of the biggest problems
people with records have is finding employment.
There's nothing bad about hiring someone
§09Transcript · 1:01:04–1:09:15
who's got a criminal record.
It doesn't reflect negatively on me,
but it shows you what they think about those people.
It shows you what they think about people
who are trying to put their lives back together
and maybe actually work for a living.
And it also shows that they're surveilling us.
They don't realize that putting this up,
they're publishing information that they could only have
if they're surveilling me and Mike,
and it doesn't occur to them,
maybe we shouldn't put that up.
- Just the general process, sad to say, of journalism
where they're looking for any kind of dirt
and they're trying to conjure up a story,
and there's something about drama and negative stories
that get clicks and so on.
So this is a general process.
The more, especially the more celebrity you become,
the more of these kinds of attacks come,
and they look for any kind of thing that could be,
it doesn't even have to be facts,
it could be just asking who is he really.
Seems to have traction on the internet.
What is the actual truth of the man you keep claiming you are
of the good man you keep claiming you are?
It's fascinating, but sometimes that can be effective.
But I think if you're being transparent and authentic
and just putting yourself out there completely
and your story completely,
then that's the best way to fight it.
That's the other reason to be prolific
on the internet, right?
The reason Joe Rogan can't get canceled
is because anyone can watch thousands of hours
of the authentic Joe Rogan.
You can't misrepresent him 'cause he spent thousands
of hours representing himself genuinely.
- Yeah, the nice thing when you're representing yourself
genuinely, you should be a good person.
So if you're a good person, then the internet will know.
They can smell out the bullshit.
Who is David Miscavige?
That's even like, 'cause you said L. Ron Hubbard
founded Scientology.
Let's go to the story of how we transitioned
from that to David Miscavige.
- The current leader of Scientology.
He was actually not selected by L. Ron Hubbard
to take over, but ended up usurping power and taking over.
- This sounds like Stalin and Trotsky and communism.
Similar story.
It's the person, oftentimes in these situation,
it's not the natural successor to power.
It's the one that takes power.
- Right.
I think the quote sometimes gets attributed
to David Miscavige is, "Power is not given,
"it is assumed."
- Yeah. - Something like that.
The last six years of L. Ron Hubbard's life,
he was often a seclusion, essentially hiding from lawsuits.
Now, by the time Hubbard went off into seclusion,
Miscavige had sort of already risen up
through the ranks of the C organization.
Now, Miscavige was like a teenager,
either like 11, 12, 13, something like that.
Miscavige was not born into Scientology,
but he was a young boy when his father
got into Scientology.
Miscavige did start working as a C org member.
There's one organization that existed
to essentially serve Hubbard directly
and to represent his interests,
and that was called the Commodore.
He was the Commodore of the C organization.
The Commodore's Messenger's organization,
we're gonna call it the CMO.
Miscavige started working for the CMO
pretty early on in his C org career,
by the way, as did Mike Rinder, Mini Mike.
And so he just became known as a doer,
like a guy who'll get it done.
No excuses, no stops, get it done.
So he had made a name for himself in the CMO
around the time, by the time Hubbard
went off into seclusion.
Now, when he went off into seclusion,
he took two other CMO, or I'm gonna call them messengers,
Commodore's Messengers.
He took two other messengers with him, Pat and Annie Broker.
Now, it has been said by people,
Mike, Mike Rinder has told me, he goes,
"The reason Pat and Annie went off with LRH
"isn't necessarily because he desperately wanted them to,
"but partly because we could afford to let them go.
"We didn't necessarily need them."
- Sure. - Okay.
And between the two of them,
Annie was the one who was like a really compassionate person,
intelligent person, caring person.
- Was there a possible trajectory of this world
where she was the one that took over?
- Yes.
In fact, Pat and Annie Broker were the two people
that were supposed to take over.
Okay, but because Pat and Annie
were with Hubbard in seclusion,
Miscavige basically had the complete run of the operation
without any oversight from Hubbard.
The only way any information would get
from Scientology World to Hubbard
is Miscavige and Pat Broker
would meet at a confidential location
and Miscavige would give Broker
any information he wanted to go to LRH.
So if Miscavige wanted to get rid of somebody,
all he had to do was feed LRH false information
that this person had been caught doing something treasonous.
And then he would get in response
some order from L. Ron Hubbard to get rid of this person.
So are there so many similarities
between various communist regimes and fascist regimes?
- Well, Hitler did the same thing
when he became the Supreme Leader.
He had to take power.
Yeah, he had to wait for the president to die,
but the whole time there's a control of information
and a slow aggregation of power.
Of course, with nations it's different
'cause if you control the military, you control a lot.
So you have to also get the generals on your side and so on.
But I'm sure in this situation
there is similar kind of dynamics.
You have to get certain people on your side,
control the flow of information,
let the original founder, the original leader die off,
and make sure that you are the one
that's left with the power.
- Right.
So whereas Pat and Annie are off with LRH,
all of Scientology's attorneys and accountants
and lobbyists and whatever, they all know Dave.
Dave's the one they deal with.
So LRH passes away, Pat and Annie make this appearance.
Nobody knows Pat and Annie.
Everybody knows Dave.
And so he ended up getting rid of Pat and Annie.
This is a very short,
perhaps slightly bastardized version of it,
of Miscavige basically.
They had been ushering just suitcases of cash
to L. Ron Hubbard during this time.
And so you have Miscavige handing boatloads of cash
to Pat Broker.
Pat would do crazy things like hide the money
in the walls of houses and dig pits and everything.
So Miscavige basically threatened to turn Pat Broker
over to the IRS for tax evasion.
Pat Broker's still alive.
- Is he a Scientologist or not?
- No, he basically went away and kept his mouth shut.
She died a handful of years ago.
She stayed a loyal Sea Org member until the very end.
But literally, Miscavige put her on menial tasks.
Like she had no authority whatsoever.
She was just put on menial tasks,
washing dishes, but not really, groundskeeper.
Just stupid low-level assistant, paper pusher stuff.
She never operated with any actual authority,
even though she was supposed to be the one
to take over her and Pat.
- So on David Miscavige, difficult question,
but can you make both the case that he is a good man
who's misunderstood and the case that he's not a good man?
- First of all, I believe that Miscavige
is a true believer in Scientology.
I do believe that.
- That's a really important question.
Do you think he believes in all the thetans and all of that?
- He definitely believes in that.
I think he believes in Scientology,
but in a different way than all other Scientologists
because he's aware of a lot more information,
damaging information about L. Ron Hubbard
and the true story of Scientology than most people.
So his version of belief is different.
I'll give you one example here.
So Scientology's bridge to total freedom
goes up to what they call OT8, Operating Thetan Level Eight.
Scientologists have all been told
that L. Ron Hubbard, before he passed,
finished, completed, putting together OT9, 10, 11, 12,
13, 14, and 15.
It's just sitting in the vault, waiting to be released.
This is part of the Scientology belief system
because remember I said going up Scientology's bridge
to total freedom is how you're supposed to get back
to your native godlike state.
Well, all the Scientologists in the world
§10Transcript · 1:09:17–1:17:25
who've already done OT8 know that they haven't gotten there,
but they still believe in Scientology
because they're told there's more.
But wait, there's more.
Miscavige knows there is no more.
So Miscavige knows the fundamental promise
of being able to achieve full Operating Thetan is a lie.
He knows L. Ron Hubbard didn't accomplish that,
so therefore no one else is going to accomplish it as well.
If L. Ron Hubbard had accomplished it,
Miscavige knows, well, he didn't write it up,
he didn't leave instructions
for how anyone else would accomplish it.
So no matter what, Miscavige knows
that the fundamental promise,
that what Scientology is saying,
they will be able to deliver to mankind is a lie.
Now it's gonna sound like I'm contradicting myself
'cause it sounds like I'm saying,
well, he knows it's bullshit.
I think he believes that L. Ron Hubbard just failed
to finish his work, and he's kind of hoping
L. Ron Hubbard's gonna come back to finish the job.
'Cause L. Ron Hubbard did tell the people
at the International Management Base,
at least a core of them, that he was coming back.
Now we know that David Miscavige believed this
because right around the 21 year mark,
he was supposed to come back like 21 years after he died.
Right around the 21 year mark,
David Miscavige was getting busy putting some things
in place that had to get done
in case L. Ron Hubbard came back.
So we know he at least believed to that level.
- Do you believe that L. Ron Hubbard
can sort of enter his own body?
- No, that's not how it works in Scientology.
- Okay, so you can't have a transfer of thetans.
If you were full OT, you could.
- Can you describe the OT again?
So OT levels, OT one, two, three, four, five to the eight.
What are they?
How do you get to level one?
- I'm gonna answer this question
by first connecting some dots.
- Yes. - Okay.
We spoke earlier in the interview
about achieving your native god-like state.
That in Scientology is called native state.
Okay, native state and full operating thetan
mean the exact same thing.
Okay, because at native state,
you are a fully operating thetan.
You know, operating meaning operating in your full capacity.
So OT means operating thetan.
So the upper confidential half of Scientology's bridge
are called the OT levels, the operating thetan levels.
And these, and remember, they're confidential.
So most Scientologists have not done these levels.
They don't know what's on them.
It is on these levels that you learn
about the Zinu in the body thetan story.
- Can you describe Zinu please?
- We spoke earlier about how at the lower
non-confidential levels of Scientology's bridge,
Hubbard is saying that what's wrong with you
is your reactive mind.
- Yes. - Okay.
Well, in Scientology,
once you've gotten rid of your reactive mind,
that is what's called the state of clear.
Okay, so after you finish state of clear,
the next thing on the bridge is the OT levels.
Well, if you've already gotten rid of your active mind,
what the heck are you supposed to do now?
Well, now L. Ron Hubbard says,
okay, first, what was wrong with you
was just your reactive mind.
But now the next thing you have to resolve,
the next thing that's wrong with you
is you actually have tens of thousands of thetans
stuck to your body,
and they all have their own reactive minds.
- Oh, wow.
- You have to audit the thetans.
- How do you audit the thetans?
Are these like different shades of your inner mind,
and you just have to try to access them somehow?
- You use the E-meter, just like we spoke about,
except now you've got a divider that separates the cans
so they don't short circuit,
and you hold both cans in one hand,
and you have the E-meter in front of you,
so now you're auditing yourself.
You're telepathically talking to the thetans
that are stuck to you.
You are thinking the commands
instead of saying them out loud,
and you sort of do drills where you practice
looking for E-meter reads at the instant you have a thought.
You're telepathically auditing spirits
that L. Ron Hubbard says are stuck to your body.
Does this sound like a recipe for a mental breakdown?
- Or a heck of a mental journey.
Wherever that leads, it could lead anywhere.
It'd probably lead to a very bad place, right?
- Very often does.
And you combine that with the fact that Scientology
is against any forms of mental health
outside of Scientology, and you have a recipe for disaster.
Now, you might go, where did all these spirits come from
that are stuck to your body?
This is where Xenu comes into play.
So Hubbard says that 75 million years ago,
Xenu was basically a dictator.
The Galactic Confederation is like 70-something
or 80-something planets somewhere in the Milky Way,
and Xenu was like a dictator, an overlord
for either one of these planets or the whole system,
and they had a population problem.
And Xenu was like, we need to get rid of half the people.
So we called them all in for tax audits.
L. Ron Hubbard didn't like the IRS,
so of course the story has to do with tax audits.
Called them all in for tax audits, said, "Psych, bitches!"
Froze them in glycol, loaded them up on space planes,
flew them to Earth.
Remember, the story has to be Earth
because the story is "What's Wrong With Us?"
Flew them to Earth, dropped them in volcanoes,
blew them up with hydrogen bombs,
and then captured them with spirit magnets.
I'm making up words 'cause, okay.
And these disembodied spirits of these people
that got blown up have just been blown in the wind
here on Earth, and they attach themselves to things,
and they can be in the environment,
and they stick to bodies and everything.
And they all have reactive minds.
So at Scientology's upper levels,
if you get sick or you have cancer
or there's something wrong with you,
Scientology will say, "That's one of your body things.
"You need to get some auditing to fix the body things."
- So this story, you do it with a kind of
a bit of a chuckle, but when done seriously,
so it's just told in a serious way,
or written down, and you read it.
- By most accounts, Scientologists struggle
when they read this for the first time
because this is not consistent with what
Scientologists are hoping for is on the OT levels.
They're hoping for some real life-changing magic.
The way these things are described and sold,
remember, they're hoping that these OT levels
are gonna give them the ability to go
completely independent of their body at will.
Exteriorize from your body, go back into your body.
Have some real spirit powers.
- So first it's kind of a shock.
But then you still probably believe, you hope.
And you might turn on yourself, self-critical,
that this is, I'm just not strong enough yet.
- Yeah, 'cause also part of Scientology,
remember, it works 100% of the time
when used 100% correctly.
And if it doesn't, it could be because
something's not being done right.
But it also could be because you're doing bad things
that you're not telling people about.
Like if you're committing present time
overts, crimes, sins, Scientologists would be like,
that's part of the reason auditing isn't working on you
is because you're committing criminal behavior
that you're not being honest about.
So every Scientologist is sort of incentivized
to make auditing work on them, okay?
Now Lex, this work is a little crazy.
On OT-3, you learn about the OT,
the body things for the first time.
When you finish OT-3, you attest to having achieved
the state of having no more body things.
And then you start OT-4, and he's like,
psych, you got more, you got more BTs,
except those other BTs, they had drug problems
and that's why you couldn't find them the first time.
So we're gonna do something a little different here,
do something a little different there.
Gotta get rid of these BTs that were addicted to drugs, okay?
Then you finish OT-4 and you're thinking,
man, I hope we get to the good stuff soon.
And then you get to OT-5 and he's like,
psych, you got more BTs.
You couldn't find these BTs
'cause they were all bunched up together in clusters
and first you have to break up the clusters
and then you can get rid of the BTs.
And you're like, okay, gotta do that.
- And this was all L. Ron Hubbard approved.
- Yeah, this is from L. Ron Hubbard.
§11Transcript · 1:17:27–1:25:47
And then after you finish OT-5,
you get rid of all the BT clusters.
OT-6 is just a training course to teach you how to audit OT-7.
Well, OT-7 is now more BTs,
except it's in the environment and stuff.
You're trying to locate BTs, you can find them on your body,
but it's just more BTs.
Okay, and then OT-8 is, remember we talked about
in all these auditing sessions
throughout the entire Scientology bridge.
You have people who've run hundreds or thousands
of past life whole track incidents.
These memories have become part of their self-identity
of who they even think they are.
OT-8, you go through all these past life recalls
and essentially, I'm oversimplifying this a little bit.
He goes, "Psych, all those past life memories weren't yours.
"They were your BTs."
And he goes, "Now that you've discovered this,
"now you know who you are not
"and you are ready to find out who you really are."
Well, now you're supposed to find out
who you really are on OT-9 and 10.
Those don't exist.
- Do we know they don't exist?
- Yes.
In fact, the whole story of how that became known
is part of how David Miscavige was able
to get rid of Pat Broker and take over power
because it was believed that Pat Broker
was in possession of the upper unreleased OT levels.
And when Miscavige determined that he was not
and there weren't in fact any levels,
that was a bad day to be David Miscavige
'cause he now knew he had something on his hands
he could not get himself out of.
He's like, "Oh."
- So there's no gap for faith to seep in
that there is a level nine and 10, 11, and 12?
- Oh, the faith is there.
Scientologists believe that these things do exist.
- Yeah.
- L. Ron Hubbard didn't leave anything behind.
- Does David Miscavige believe they exist?
- Oh no, he knows they don't exist.
- No, but-- - When I say exist,
oh, I don't mean do advanced levels
of spiritual awareness exist.
When I said it, it means did L. Ron Hubbard
write down what anyone is supposed to do
that's called OT nine?
That doesn't exist.
- So you're saying David Miscavige believes
that they can be written down so they exist
sort of in a platonic sense and L. Ron Hubbard
is the only one that can write it down?
- Yes. - So his faith
is really deep.
- Oh, you mean his faith that only L. Ron Hubbard
could have ever been the one to do it?
- Yes. - The full principles,
beliefs of Scientology, he is,
are you sure he believes?
- That what exactly?
- Everything about Scientology that is true.
- To the best of my ability to know that,
I believe it to be true.
Like I'll give you some all even stupid examples.
Like Mike Renders told a story
where at the International Base,
Miscavige actually had like a copper contraption
built into the ground, like grounded into the ground
to come out where you could hold it
and he had something he sort of came up with to,
your BT, it could ground your BTs.
Could get your BTs that if you were feeling
overstimulated or something.
I'm probably slightly bastardizing this story.
But he came up with this as a great idea,
something to help someone de-stimulate
if their BTs were getting a little too overactive.
Now, so that's a stupid story that's sort of like,
well, it shows you he believes in the concept of BTs
if he's creating little rods to get rid of them,
to ground them into the earth.
- Well, he could be conjuring up the stories
because he understands the power of myth and narrative
and so on to inspire.
- Sure.
- But like, but also if we look at history,
both with, this is an interesting thing
because I've been reading a lot about Hitler and Stalin
and it seems like both of them in different ways
believed in the stories they were telling.
Even when the stories, this is the fascinating,
especially with Hitler and propaganda,
where they were literally conjured up at first.
But then you start to believe you're in propaganda.
With Stalin, I think what he always believed
is the bigger ideal of pure communism
and anything justifies the journey to communism
because it will ultimately be good for humanity
to achieve the state of pure communism.
And then he's a godlike figure that can bring humanity there.
But like, with Hitler, it's interesting
because there's constant propaganda
that he knows is not true.
A little bit, there's gotta be doubt,
but then he like, all doubt is removed very quickly.
- Yeah.
I guess humans are just, this is how they operate.
- Yeah.
The conversation about David Miscavige
gets really interesting because I could give you a,
if I wanted to make the argument that he didn't believe,
I could give you a dozen examples to make that argument.
I just happen to think that he believes in a different way,
whereas your average Scientologist
believes that Alvaron Hubbard was practically infallible,
that he thought of everything in advance,
he took care of everything before he left,
and Miscavige still believes in like,
the main structure of this thing,
but he's like, "Oh shit, it's falling to me
"to figure out how to actually make this thing happen."
I think Miscavige sees himself as someone
who has to a certain degree had to go back
and fix Alvaron Hubbard's mistakes.
- Do you think he sees himself as doing good for the world?
- I do.
- What about for the people of Scientology?
- I think in his own way, he does.
I don't think he wakes up thinking
he's screwing Scientologists.
I think he sees everyone else as screwing him.
I think he sees that it is his job to expand Scientology
throughout the world and accomplish the aims of Scientology,
and he sees that it's not happening,
and he thinks if everyone else would just stop,
if everyone else would get out of his way
and stop creating problems for him, it would happen.
I do think he sees himself as someone who is doing good.
I think that's fair to say.
I think the evidence shows that.
- What about the effects of clearly power and influence
that he's had and money?
- Yeah, without question,
that has served as a corrupting force.
- It has. - Without question.
- Have you seen sort of evidence of that,
that he's changed over time?
- After the 1993 IRS exemption that Scientology won back,
and this information comes from Mike Rinder,
that's when David Miscavige,
as soon as the checks on his power were removed,
Miscavige's behavior changed markedly.
- Can you tell the story of Shelley Miscavige
and the mystery surrounding her?
I saw that there is quite a bit of mystery.
- Yeah, so Shelley Miscavige, for many years,
held the job of her post in the C organization
was David Miscavige's assistant.
That was her post.
It's important to truly understand that and what that means
because the fact that she was Miscavige's wife
is meaningless, and this is something that's hard
for regular people in the regular world
to truly grasp how meaningless it is in Scientology.
For C-org members who are spouses, it means nothing.
- Your role matters more within C-org.
- Your role's the only thing that matters.
So let's say if Shelley was married to Dave,
but she worked in a different organization.
She would never be seen with him ever, publicly ever.
Wouldn't travel with him,
wouldn't go to events with him, nothing.
Sometime around 2006, 2007,
and I'm very oversimplifying this, okay?
Shelley basically pissed off Dave to the point
where he's like, "Okay, I'm done with you.
"I'm gonna take you off of your post."
Okay?
At that point, she was reassigned
to another confidential Scientology base
up in Twin Peaks, California.
Why am I, the reason I'm providing this type of detail
is because we hear that Shelley's missing.
- Yeah.
- Okay, well, you realize the same people
who report that Shelley's missing
are also the same people
who will tell you exactly where she is.
Okay, she works at this secretive CST,
Church of Spiritual Technology base
out in Twin Peaks, California.
I have personal confirmation that she was seen
and spoken with by someone who knew her well in,
I'll say 2019.
Shelley Miscavige is missing in the sense that
she hasn't been seen with David Miscavige since about 2006.
§12Transcript · 1:25:52–1:34:00
But because she's no longer his assistant,
you would never see her with him.
- As opposed to like the mystery of a person
that might be murdered,
this is more of a reallocation within the organization.
- Certain people who cover Scientology,
who have published stories
where Shelley's Miscavige's family member
told a story to another family member,
who told the story to a friend,
who told the story to a former Scientologist,
who told the story to a journalist,
who published the story,
has created the impression
that some of Shelley Miscavige's family members
are actually talking to the press,
when in fact that has never occurred.
And so the very people who are publishing
about Shelley Miscavige missing
have contributed to the fact that Shelley Miscavige
does no longer speak to those family members
because she thinks they're talking to the press
when they never have.
It's pretty messed up.
- It's sad that she,
'cause those family members would be a way for her
to recover, to flourish as a human being, to escape.
- Yeah.
So I believe the information that I have,
that I verified,
I'm the one representing it's true
without revealing my sources.
That Shelley was still actively in touch regularly
with family members outside of the C organization
since about, until about 2014.
So I mean regularly.
Okay, so there's no question about her safety
during that period.
And then someone else who knew Shelley very well
did see her and actually have a conversation with her
in a public place in 2019 or 2020.
Now somebody could still come along and be like,
"How do we know she's okay?
"It's been three years."
Yeah, okay, you can say that about anybody.
You know, the nature of working
in the highest levels of Scientology management
at these super secretive bases,
it's a very weird and unique situation.
It has isolation baked in.
- How is secrecy enforced?
Why is everybody holding on to their stories so intensely?
People that are within the organization.
Like it's hard to leak information.
- Oh, they wouldn't wanna leak.
They're true believers.
They see, like there's sort of a conspiracy theory
that runs right through all of Scientology,
which is that Scientology represents
like an existential threat to the powers
that really control this planet.
- Do they have a face to the powers that really control?
Do they have names to it?
Like who's controlling?
- It's Zeno's homies.
- Well, I'm sure that's not what they say.
Zeno embodied in--
- It's actually sort of a multifaceted conspiracy
in that on the one hand, L. Ron Hubbard points his fingers
at like the international bankers,
which has shades of antisemitism to it.
- And then the IRS is going to be quickly baked in or no?
- The IRS, no, the IRS is so low on the totem pole
as far as the, I mean, the international bankers,
he would say runs everything.
- Got it.
- But use that these bankers also use big pharma
and big psych to control the population.
And Scientology is famously against pharma and psych.
And so this is sort of how L. Ron Hubbard characterizes
like this big war between Scientology
that's trying to set everyone free
and big pharma and big psych
that's trying to enslave everyone on the planet.
- Yeah, controlling their mind,
controlling their body through chemicals and--
- And who controls the press, big pharma and big psych.
- So there's a lot of correlation
to other kinds of conspiracy theories.
- Yeah.
- Oh, that's fascinating.
- But you asked the question
where why would all these people hold onto their stories?
They don't, they would never wanna leak.
Like by even anyone who would wanna leak
would not even wanna be a Scientologist anymore.
Like if you truly believe,
if you truly believe in Scientology
and you got your shoulder to the wheel
and you're a C-ORG member,
you think Scientology is literally the only thing
that can save every being on this planet
from a fate of eternal amnesia and slavery.
- Yeah.
- Right?
And so it's like, I mean, you've seen the Matrix, right?
So you've got everyone,
once you're unplugged from the Matrix
and you realize, yeah, you can get plugged back in
and live your nice life, but you're a slave.
That's how Scientologists see this planet.
They actually, they refer to Earth as a prison planet.
- Just at an individual level,
how is it possible to reach a person like that?
Is there something you could say to that?
Like what's the journey of reaching a person like that?
- I personally, because when I was in those shoes,
I say there's nothing anybody could have said to me
to get me to change how I felt and thought about Scientology.
It's almost foolproof that the more evidence
you try to present that there's something wrong
with what Scientology is doing,
the more you're just working for the psychs.
It's very, very difficult.
I mean, most people who leave Scientology
leave because they have had some personal experience
that was just such a grave injustice
that it just pushed them beyond the point
of what they were willing to experience.
Very rare, I'm not sure I've really ever heard a story
of someone going, yeah, I just woke up,
I just gradually realized it was all BS and drifted away.
It's usually like, no, I really believed
and they treated me so horribly,
I almost had no choice but to leave.
And then the stories get pretty crazy.
- Meaning you don't care what's true anymore,
you just have to leave with the unpleasant feeling,
the suffering.
- Yeah, and this sort of goes back to the conversation
we're having about like, well, does Miscavige really believe?
And I said I could make an argument
for the fact that he doesn't, right?
Because I go, it wouldn't be that hard
to change the way Scientology treats people
just a little bit and you'd probably stop losing anyone
because Scientologists already believe
to such a strong degree, you have to be pretty
fricking horrible to people to make them leave.
And that's where you go, well, does Miscavige
even want Scientology to expand?
'Cause if he was really being clever about it,
it seems like he could at least stop the bleeding
and yet he doesn't.
So that's where you make the argument,
well, if he doesn't, then he must not want to.
- So his mind is corrupted to the point
where he's not able to actually be
a good businessman essentially.
- It seems that way.
The numbers of Scientologists have been going down
and down and down since the early '90s.
- Is there a good, I mean, it's very difficult
to get to this number, but is there a good estimate
of what the current number of Scientologists,
of practicing Scientologists is?
- Oh yeah, I did a video about this.
It's actually quite easy to get to the number.
It's not more than 35,000 in the entire world.
And that's being very generous and charitable.
I was intentionally generous.
I broke it all down in a spreadsheet and everything.
- Can you give some insights of how you get that info?
- Sure, there's about 175 to 200 Scientology organizations
in the world.
Anybody who's ever worked at these organizations know
there's not more than 35 to 50 staff members per org.
There's not more than one to 200
public Scientologists per org.
I broke down the number of SEERG members
who'd be working at every continental management unit,
middle management, international management.
I broke it on the mission network.
And I was generous.
I mean, my numbers were like, if L. Ron Hubbard came back
and they were doing an event,
L. Ron Hubbard was coming back and announcing OT nine and 10
how many Scientologists could we scrape together
in every city to come to this event?
It wasn't more than 35,000.
Now contrast that to what Scientology says.
Millions, 10 million people.
- Is this less people than there used to be?
- Yeah, at its peak it was about 100,000 active members.
- But never the millions.
- Never, no.
- Has David Miscavige used violence?
Has there, in your understanding of it,
in your estimation, sort of harassment, assault,
and actual, I don't know how to define assault, but violence?
§13Transcript · 1:34:05–1:41:24
- Oh yeah, dozens of former SEERG members
from the international base have told stories
of being assaulted by Miscavige.
In fact, Mike Rinder is probably the one person
who's been assaulted by Miscavige more than anyone else.
He's personally probably been assaulted dozens of times.
- Who is Mike Rinder?
- So Mike Rinder, one of the highest ranking executives
in Scientology.
- The author.
- There you go, a billion years.
- Of a billion years.
- It really is a fantastic book.
'Cause Lex, the guy was born and raised in Scientology
and worked personally with L. Ron Hubbard
and worked personally with David Miscavige for decades.
Doesn't get much more insider than that.
A candid and deeply felt memoir of a life lost
to false belief and courageously regained.
Lawrence Wright.
A billion years, my escape from a life
in the highest ranks of Scientology, Mike Rinder.
- It's a fantastic book.
He also narrates his own audio book too.
I know you like the audio books, that's how I listen to it.
So Mike famously, I just said a moment ago,
like someone who's treated so horribly,
even though he still believed in Scientology,
he had no choice but to leave.
And he tells the story in that book
and he still believed in Scientology for years
after he escaped, for years.
'Cause there's this thing called
the Independent Scientology Movement
or the Free Zone or whatever.
There are people who do Scientology
outside of the Church of Scientology.
There's just not many of them.
But Mike was one of those people
who was actually doing Scientology even after he left.
Now he no longer believes in that anymore
and he doesn't do it.
But even though he still believed,
even though everything he knew
was what he was leaving behind,
he still had to leave it behind.
- And by the way, I just opened a random page
and he says, "When I signed on for Sea Org
"in Adelaide in 1973, the recruiter promised
"I would train as a Scientology executive
"under the direct tutelage of Hubbard on the Apollo."
So this is another thing I should probably ask you about.
- Oh, we could go for days.
- I was also told that after I learned
all I needed to learn at the foot of the Master,
I would return to Australia
to help expand Scientology in my home country.
So what was the thing that really broke him?
- The final thing is when he got to a point
where he was no longer being forced
to lie to protect L. Ron Hubbard.
He was now being forced to lie to protect David Miscavige.
And specifically, it was about the allegations
of having been assaulted by Miscavige.
Mike Rinder was at some event,
it might have been a grand opening for a building,
a Scientology building in London.
And I believe it was John Sweeney,
at that time a BBC journalist,
who stuck a camera and a microphone in Mike's face.
"Is it true David Miscavige assaulted, is it true?"
And Mike denied it on camera.
And then turned around and to himself is like,
"This is what my life has been reduced to?
"Lying to protect David Miscavige?
"This used to be about L. Ron Hubbard.
"This used to be about Scientology.
"Now it's about protecting this douchebag?"
And Miscavige had just issued orders
that was gonna send Mike off to Australia.
Like Miscavige is sadistic.
That is without question.
- Sadistic meaning?
- He enjoys inflicting pain upon others.
So he very specifically was gonna tell Mike,
tell Rinder or tell that cocksucker,
"We're shipping him off to Australia.
"He's never gonna see his wife and his kids again."
Essentially.
And that's when Mike was like,
"They were the only reason I hadn't already left.
"So if I follow the orders, I'm gonna lose 'em.
"If I leave Scientology, I'm gonna lose 'em.
"At least if I leave Scientology,
"I'll be free of something."
It's fucking sad.
- And he still believed Scientology
to some degree after he left, is what you're saying?
- Yeah.
- Has he spoken about what it took to let go
of believing in Scientology?
- He does a very good job talking about
all of this in the book.
And it took him like four or five years
to get that book done.
It's a polished version.
It's a polished version of his story.
And I think Mike's about getting ready
to start his own YouTube channel.
So that'll be a lot of fun.
Actually, Mike comes on my channel all the time.
- Yeah, you guys do a thing together, right?
- Yeah, we do Three Amigos
with me and Mike Rinder and Mark Hedley.
That's why I gave you Mark's book.
I thought maybe you would know him
from our little Three Amigos,
our Mondays with Mike and Mark videos.
- Mark Hedley, blown for good
behind the iron curtain of Scientology.
- So he escaped from the International Base on a motorcycle.
It's a wild story.
- Nice.
- I won't even try to do it justice.
- Who's a better writer of the two of them?
(laughing)
- You're not gonna get me there.
- I'm trying to be investigative journalist for once.
- Mike and Mark are both on the board
of the Aftermath Foundation with me.
- Who's better looking?
No, I'm just kidding.
- It's one of my justifications
for just putting up content every day
is every video is just an excuse to,
in some little way, promote the Aftermath Foundation.
And I do that again, one, to genuinely help people escape,
and two, 'cause I know it drives David Miscavige crazy.
- If you look in your own heart, is there anger there?
- I don't think it's anger.
I don't hate Scientology.
I don't hate David Miscavige.
I don't even hate my experience in Scientology.
- Do you able to accept the good from your experience?
- Yeah, absolutely.
But it's also the only path that I traveled.
So I tend, okay, a little less so these days,
but earlier in life, I tended to attribute
all positive characteristics in me to Scientology,
'cause in my simplistic way of thinking, I was like,
what else could it possibly be attributed to?
That's a very black and white way of seeing it.
- Well, it's a beautiful way to see life.
No matter what happens to you, you attribute,
like you focus on the positive,
and you feel like sometimes people have traumatic experiences
with parents and so on.
And if you focus on the positive,
it's a good way to let go of the trauma associated with it.
- True.
But like another example would be like,
I didn't go to school, like I stopped going to school
in the seventh grade, but people go,
but you sound so smart.
And what am I supposed to do?
Am I supposed to say, well, it's 'cause of Scientology?
Like, how do I answer that question?
Like, if it's the only path I traveled,
how do I answer that question?
I don't necessarily wanna give Scientology credit,
but what the hell am I supposed to point to?
- Sure. - You know?
I mean, you said you kind of enjoy,
I mean, part of it is you joking and trolling,
that you enjoy knowing that your YouTube channel
drives Dave Miscavige crazy.
I mean, what, that means you still,
I mean, there is a joy you have.
- There is a joy.
I'm not gonna deny that.
- I don't know what to make of that.
'Cause there's a, I suppose there's an intimacy
when you're part of a tribe of that kind.
- It's almost like, let me try to frame it.
I wasn't trying to get kicked out of Scientology.
I was trying to not get kicked out of Scientology.
So what happened, first my mom got kicked out
for basically talking some smack about David Miscavige.
And then they go to me and they go,
okay, you've gotta disconnect from your mom
or you're gonna get kicked out.
And I lied about that.
I was like, okay, I'll disconnect.
But I never did.
For a couple years, I lied my ass off about it.
Eventually, they were like,
this guy's gonna keep lying to us, right?
And they're like, yeah.
Like, all right, you're out.
So then they go to my wife,
§14Transcript · 1:41:25–1:50:11
say, you gotta divorce your husband
or you're gonna get kicked out.
And she goes, no.
- That's a hell of a statement from her.
It's gonna get harder from here.
So I'm not quite sure how to.
- Okay, I'll try to get, I'll try to do my best.
- You don't seem like a man who's afraid of hard things.
- Okay, so she's like, no.
So then they go to her parents.
And they say, you've got to disconnect from your daughter
and your three granddaughters
or you're gonna get kicked out.
But they have three other kids who are Scientologists,
who have spouses who are Scientologists,
who have grandkids.
So I feel like up until that point,
everybody was sort of making a decision for themselves
and what would be best for themselves
until they get to her parents.
And then they're like, which grandkids are we gonna lose?
Okay?
At the part where they were trying to get me
to disconnect from my mom,
there were hours that I spent talking to them going,
you know, guys, there's another way.
It doesn't have to go this way.
There's another way that ends well for all of us.
And that wasn't even considered.
And I go, like, they created this monster.
And that's a fact.
And that's why I take joy in it.
When people ask me, is Scientology a destructive cult?
I don't even have to get into all the academic discussions
of what's a religion and what's a cult
and what's the difference.
I go, as long as they destroy families like that,
they're a cult.
- So they cut people off deliberately, one by one.
And it doesn't have to be that way.
- Right.
- And why is it that way?
- I mean, it started with L. Ron Hubbard
laying out a policy framework, a policy structure,
that if interpreted and applied in the worst possible way,
with the worst possible judgment,
can be abused in that way.
I would make the argument
that if an anti-broker had taken over,
that Scientology policy does have enough
little caveats baked into it
that even the policies about disconnection
could be interpreted and implemented
in a non-destructive way.
There is room for judgment and discretion.
And Miscavige has just created
the worst possible version of Scientology.
And that's where you sort of get that argument of,
does he even want Scientology to succeed?
'Cause he seems to be hell-bent
on making sure that he doesn't.
- Yeah.
- And I don't want to see him make it succeed,
but it does bring that question up of like,
what are his motivations?
Can he not see that he's destroying the thing
he's supposed to be expanding?
- That's also, you know, there's ways to measure cost.
And that would probably be the most costly aspect
of Scientology, is the suffering associated
with the separating of families.
- Yeah.
- And that actually just puts, makes it very concrete
what we value in human life,
is the connection to our loved ones.
Like everything else doesn't matter.
Like getting 50 bucks a week.
Getting money stolen from you,
getting the truth stolen from you,
none of that compares.
You can even frame that as the good.
There could be a lot of positives, whatever, in the tribe.
But separating families, separating loved ones,
that's the destructive thing.
- So no hate though?
- No, I genuinely don't hate them.
- Do you forgive them?
- 100%.
There's no one I look at in Scientology that I go,
how dare you?
If I was in their shoes, having to, you know,
operate under David Miscavige's orders,
I would have done the same thing,
and I would have loved it.
Truthfully, I don't blame any of them.
I mean, I take the opposite approach.
If they knew what I knew, they'd be doing what I'm doing.
If they knew what I knew and believed it,
they'd be doing what I'm doing.
They're not dumb.
It's not dumb people in Scientology.
- They're ambitious, they're dreamers,
they got hope, they're driven, all that kind of stuff.
- Yeah.
And it's one of the reasons I like putting up content
on my channel so they can see, hey,
like if you're a Scientologist,
you look at that and you go, hey,
he seems like he's doing well, he's happy,
he's a positive guy, he's a good communicator,
he knows what he's talking about,
he's not lying, he's not exaggerating.
I don't exaggerate anything on my channel.
I don't make up anything.
And this actually comes from an experience I had
from 1998 to 2000.
I was living in LA, I sort of had a two-year period
in my life where I actually had
almost no contact with Scientology.
And during that time, I found my way onto the internet.
And there was a website, it might have been
ESMB, X Scientology message, but whatever it was,
it was at that time the main source of critical information
about Scientology on the internet.
And I looked at it, and remember,
I was still a true believer.
And I looked at this and it was so offensive,
insulting, hyperbolic, exaggerated,
I was like, oh, just a bunch of bullshit.
I was in Scientology for 16 more years.
If what I had seen on the internet
about critical of Scientology,
if what I had seen when I had seen it
was something that actually resonated with me,
that I was like, oh, that I believed was true,
that seemed credible, I would have gotten out
of Scientology 16 years earlier.
So I was like, how can I help create an experience
on the internet that if a Scientologist stumbles upon it,
it will resonate with them instead of repelling them?
And that is exactly what I have set out to do
and what I believe I've accomplished.
- There's the content, the message,
but also just showing that you can be happy
outside of Scientology.
- Exactly.
- You can have a fulfilling life, you can be a good man.
- Yeah. - All that.
What benefit do you think Tom Cruise gets from Scientology?
So why is he still in Scientology?
- He genuinely loves it.
And also, Miscavige does, there's one celebrity
who does have the most unique experience in Scientology,
and that is Tom.
Scientology hires all of Tom's staff.
All of Tom's staff are subject to interrogations
by Scientology, not only in the hiring process,
but during the employment.
David Miscavige on Scientology runs Tom Cruise's life
and his production company and his household staff.
- Do you imagine there's some personal connection there
where they like each other a lot?
- Best friends.
I mean, it's them against the world is how they see it.
I think it's pretty easy to see how that works
between the two of them.
I think this idea of them against the world,
us against the world, is a really powerful, intimate,
I kind of see like friendships and relationships that way.
I mean, not in a dark sense, but it's like,
the world is full of cruelty and absurdity
and unfairness and so on.
It's nice to huddle together like the penguins
in March of the People against the cold.
- 100%. - And they're just like,
and so, especially with the ideology of Scientology,
this idea that you can be anything,
you can essentially, I mean, you can manifest it,
essentially, through like believing it.
I mean, you don't really put it into those words,
but believing that you're a god
is a really like inspiring, positive thing to think.
- If they could figure out how to do all that
without destroying families and bankrupting its members,
they might actually have a future.
That's why, like it's funny,
'cause sometimes I feel like it's like,
like I'm rooting for them to like succeed and do it right,
and I'm not, but it's an interesting academic discussion
to have of like, we can all see how much people
will sacrifice in the names of belief and religion.
We can see how much Scientologists sacrifice
based on what they already believe.
If you would just start treating people less horribly,
you know what I'm saying?
It might actually have a future.
Not that I want it to.
It seems like this dark lesson of human nature
that there's something about, to use the word cults,
that you just stop seeing reality for what it is.
§15Transcript · 1:50:16–1:57:47
There's a lot of things that could make this
a better organization that's actually helping people flourish
and be a little bit more like loose about membership,
not dividing families, not causing suffering,
not causing financial harm,
but actually inspiring people and helping people.
But then maybe it fundamentally changes
what the organization is.
And maybe that means somebody like David Miscavige
loses power too, which might be very difficult,
or people that are close to him lose power,
and people hold onto power.
Whatever the human forces here,
it seems to become worse and worse over time.
What about, oh, let me ask a conspiracy question.
Is there a chance that Tom Cruise is being blackmailed?
That there's information from auditing?
No? - No.
- So that kind of stuff is not, that's very conspiratorial.
- I've actually come out and said definitively,
I do not know of a single person who stays in Scientology
because they're afraid of being blackmailed.
It's just not a thing.
It's just not a thing.
Does Scientology have enough information
to blackmail someone if they wanted to?
Well, sure.
I mean, and it doesn't even have to be true.
It could just be lies.
Who cares?
Who knows?
Scientology can say whatever the hell they want.
So that's the thing, it doesn't even have to be true.
And actually, that would be the argument against blackmailing.
Like in order for Scientology to blackmail you
with that information, they'd actually have to represent
that yes, he really did tell us this.
And it's like, well, then why are you spilling secrets
of members, right?
Like it sets a bad precedent.
- What are some of the sins according to Scientology?
- Most of the sins from a Scientology perspective
are just doing or saying anything that brings disrepute
to Scientology itself, right?
Remember, it's not like Christianity where there's rules.
If you break this rule, you're not getting into heaven.
'Cause Scientology doesn't think about things that way.
- Oh, there's the drug.
You can't do drugs, right?
- You can't do drugs.
And you can't take any psychotropic medications.
- And no medications almost at all?
- You're allowed to take medications.
It's just, there's no rules expressly prohibiting it.
It's just most Scientologists tend not to.
You can take Advil, but many Scientologists won't.
- Okay.
- You just can't take anything prescribed
by a psychiatrist, a psychologist,
or any drugs that are psychotropic drugs.
I mean, SSRIs are considered probably the closest thing
to pure evil in the world of Scientology.
- What about, weird question, what about sex?
Is there boundaries on what's?
- There used to not be.
It's become very puritanical in the last many decades.
For a reason I can't actually explain.
Like, miscavige does seem to be infatuated
with controlling sex.
Like, that is one thing about miscavige version
of Scientology that's gotten very strange.
I mean, L. Ron Hubbard even specifically wrote a policy
that says we are no longer going to regulate
in any way the bedroom activities of people.
He literally said, from this point on,
no one is allowed to be subject to any justice actions
of any kind whatsoever for anything they do
in their sexual lives.
But that still did not give permission
for gay relationships.
That was still referring to straight stuff.
- And monogamous only.
Can you do open marriages and open relationships?
- According to L. Ron Hubbard policy, you can.
- Yeah, but you know.
- I think he wrote that policy before he created
the C organization.
And then what happened is, this is actually
how this came into effect.
He created the C organization.
You had a lot of people on a ship,
and everybody was just banging each other,
and it created just a nightmare of personal relationship.
It was making production impossible.
Not 'cause everybody was spending so much time banging,
but because everybody was so upset
about who was banging who.
- Yeah, yeah.
(laughing)
I mean, sex and that kind of dynamic is really,
I mean, humans do what humans do,
and then there's drama and all that.
It's understandable, 'cause everybody's so intimate.
It's a closed tribe.
It makes sense to limit sex.
Otherwise, it becomes a sex cult,
which a lot of them end up becoming.
On that topic, would you classify Scientology as a cult?
- 100%.
But not because I'm fully conversant
with the academic differentiations
between what's a religion and what's a cult.
I mean, Scientology would say,
"Well, all small new religions are cults."
And I don't know, that's probably true.
Some people would say, "All religions are cults."
And I'd be like, "Depends on how you define religion,
"and it depends on how you define cult."
But I just fall back on my thing of,
if you're destroying families and bankrupting your members,
you're a cult.
That's how I look at it.
- It's us versus them, and the them could be your family,
it could be your loved ones.
That's deeply destructive,
and one of the things you would probably throw
into the definition of a cult
is something that's actually destructive.
'Cause I do a lot of stuff that's cult-like, like Jiu-Jitsu.
There's a lot of really close-knit tribes,
but there's no negative toxicity to it.
There's no divide, there's no divisions.
Or if there is, it's more, boy.
Try being a fan of a certain soccer team
and then becoming a fan of another soccer team.
- That's hardcore.
- And they (exhales)
(Zubin laughs)
- But I'll tell you, I train Jiu-Jitsu as well,
and I have found that community of people
to be one of the most loving
and helpful group of people ever.
Shout out to John Keller, Gracie Baja Clearwater.
No, but seriously, it's one of the reasons
I continue to do it, despite my back, my hip, my shoulder.
It's like, it's just such a cool group of guys.
- Goes on.
I think it was much more divisive in the beginning
from the Brazilian roots.
One of the things that's really hard
is the team-oriented.
If you're this team, you're ride or die with this team,
and there's no, there's the Crianchas,
they go to another team.
And I think that aspect, that was actually a turnoff
for me in the beginning, that the toxicity of that.
Because I understand that a little bit for the elites,
for the highest of the highest.
That there is, I like the brotherhood
and the loyalty of the people,
like the Olympic gold medalists,
the best in the world, yes.
But for recreational fun, it's like,
this is ultimately about the camaraderie
of all human beings together,
not some, whatever label you put on yourself.
I don't think we actually talked
about the organization itself.
We talked about tax-exempt status,
which is really important.
We talked about some of the control,
like through the propaganda control of what's out there.
It's actually interesting that you said that
Scientology has pretty much lost the battle
with the internet at this point.
- Oh yeah.
- Which is kind of inspiring
that it's hard to defeat the internet.
But then there's bots that are,
I think if you're sophisticated,
I'm not sure that's true.
But if you're not--
- It's kind of remarkable they haven't been able
to capitalize on these bot armies.
'Cause there's one thing that they have,
it's a lot of tax-free money
that they got nothing else better to do.
- Yeah, right, they can invest.
- They just, they should give you a call.
Like they just don't have the right people apparently.
- But that said, how do they wield influence
with government agencies?
You've talked about the local police enforcement,
also federal agencies, anything.
- That is the one way they effectively
put their money to use, is lobbyists and attorneys,
judges, very rarely have they ever been able
just to get a politician on their side.
It's the behind the scenes people.
Greta Van Susteren's a very high level
§16Transcript · 1:57:49–2:05:54
long-term Scientologist.
And her husband, I always get it wrong,
it's either Jim Cole or John Cole, I always get it wrong.
He's a very powerful attorney
who has a lot, wields a lot of influence behind the scenes.
And that's just one example.
Like the reason why that's an interesting example
is 'cause he's actually a Scientologist
and he travels in those circles.
Scientology though, its money goes to good use
by hiring non-Scientologists, retired judges,
attorneys, lobbyists.
It really is how they get almost anything done.
Like Miscavige himself is not hobnobbing
and glad hanging and shaking hands and meeting these folks.
It's the non-Scientologist professionals
who work behind the scenes on Scientology's behalf.
- Can you describe the dynamics of that,
how that actually happens?
Like why would the police department work
on behalf of Scientology?
- I meant more the courts and regulators,
not the police department.
But well, for example,
it can come down to something as simple as this.
In Clearwater, Scientology hires Clearwater police
to do off-duty work for them.
They pay like three times the normal off-duty rate.
So they will, even though I'm not aware of anyone
on the Clearwater PD who's actually a Scientologist,
they basically end up with,
they would call them allies or safe points.
- Got it. - Right?
People who like will literally operate as Scientology spies.
Someone comes in and follows a report
about some child sex case.
Someone in the Clearwater PD is calling Sarah Heller
at the Office of Special Affairs at the Flying Aladdin Base
to let her know, "Hey, heads up, we got a thing coming in."
And then Scientology can run around
and go talk to all the Scientologists
who have knowledge about this
and either get them out of Clearwater, you know.
- So it's not like a direct explicit corruption,
but more just friends and coworkers
integrated deeply in the community.
- Yeah, I call it soft corruption.
So another example, you have the mayor of Clearwater,
Frank Hibbard, well, he used to,
when he won his recent election,
he stepped down from some of these nonprofits
that he served on.
But the nonprofits that he served on
also gets millions of dollars of donations
from some of Scientology's richest Clearwater members, right?
You have one of the mayor's best friends, Joe Burdette,
literally a paid lobbyist for Scientology.
So that creates a chilling effect
on anyone who's gonna be talking smack about Scientology
because his friends are on their damn payroll.
So I call it soft corruption.
It's not illegal, it's not illegal,
but it's how Scientology wields influence.
And what's ironic is that a lot of these people
who work on Scientology's behalf
actually secretly hate Scientology.
They kind of see through it, but it's part of the community.
I mean, it's deeply integrated in the community,
and there's financial leverage.
Are you ever afraid?
I mean, afraid for your well-being,
afraid for your ability to function in society
because of the pressures from Scientology?
- No.
- Is that because you're genetically malfunctioning
or mentally, or is there,
speaking out is a kind of protection?
- I think it's one of those things
that once you've seen behind the curtain
and you see the Wizard of Oz is just a silly man,
you just don't have any fear.
Now, it's one of these things,
like people will say, "Oh, you're so brave."
And I go, "Eh, what's that quote?"
Bravery is being a soldier
and being afraid and going in any way.
It's not brave to run in if you don't think
nothing's gonna happen to you.
I do not hold myself up as an example of bravery
'cause it's not like, "Oh, they could destroy me,
"but I don't care."
No, there's not a damn thing they can do to me.
And that's one of the reasons
I continue to put out content every day.
To just basically go, "Hey, still here.
"I dare you to try to do something about it, but you can't."
And hope that that also serves as kind of an example
for other people to go, "If this schmo can do it
"and they can't do anything else to him,
"then maybe I can do it too."
'Cause I would love it.
I would love there to be 20 channels
where former Scientologists talk about their experience.
- I mean, that is bravery
because what happens is fear seeps in
even if it's not grounded in reality.
But at the same time, my grandfather
who fought in World War II,
I mean, the story is, I mean, he was very convinced
and sure most of the people he fought alongside with died.
He was a machine gunner,
but he believed that bullets can't hit him.
Right? - That's what he said?
- Mm-hmm.
Well, you know, he was right.
Right?
'Cause he survived.
So there's some sense like you're--
- Survivor bias.
- That he's like, just like you are.
He was like, "I'm not brave.
"I just, bullets can't hit me."
(laughing)
I mean, there's a dark kind of truth to that.
There's some, you know, it's like a,
it's a feedback loop where if you have the confidence
and you push on forward and you're brave in that way
to not let fear seep in and affect you,
it actually gives you less things to be scared about.
I mean, but that initial few steps might be,
for people, it might be a very difficult step to take
to talk about it publicly.
- The fear was knowing how the family
was gonna be destroyed and trying to prevent that.
I was terrified of that happening.
But it happened.
There's nothing left to be afraid of.
And that's kind of the thing.
Like, they created this beast.
And the same is true for Mark Hedley.
The same is true for Mike Rinder.
I said, they've essentially created
a Scientology-proof virus,
Scientology-resistant strain,
by throwing everything they have at us
for so many years.
They have just, through natural selection,
created people who just do not give a damn
about anything they could or would do.
And maybe there is something a little wrong with me.
'Cause when I get a phone call from someone like,
I just got this phone call about you,
and it's clear that it's Scientology PIs
doing work behind the scenes, I get really excited.
I get really excited.
I don't get nervous.
I don't go, oh no, it's happening.
I'm like, oh yeah, this is gonna be exciting.
I'm like, okay.
Because everything they try to do to me,
I'm gonna figure out how to reflect it back on them
and make them look ridiculous.
- And that pales in comparison
to the separating from family.
- Exactly.
- Is there parts of your family
that you've lost because of Scientology?
- Just, yeah.
If you...
Most of my episode
on the Lee Remedy in the Aftermath show
was talking about me and my twin brother.
It's just a pretty horrible story.
It's just a pretty horrible story.
So I do have a younger brother
who's still in Scientology and disconnected from me,
but I never had much of a relationship with that brother,
really, to begin with.
But my twin brother died when I was like 23 or 24.
And that was, without any question,
a direct result of our Scientology experience.
He died in a car accident
that wasn't technically his fault or anything.
He wasn't even the one driving.
But the specific fact of his death was not,
meaning the fact and the manner of his death
wasn't specifically because of Scientology.
But our story and where our relationship got to,
and how he was even in a position
of having something like that happen to him
is directly attributable to Scientology.
- Do you think about him?
Miss him?
Is part of what you're doing in memory of him?
- Yeah, for sure.
- Man, this is such a--
- I mean, we were identical twins.
Can you imagine two of me?
- I can barely handle one.
- I love it.
§17Transcript · 2:05:58–2:13:00
- Losing him, would that be the darkest moment
in this whole journey of Scientology for you?
- Two moments would equal the darkest moment.
It would be that and also just the period of,
six, nine, 12 months of impending doom.
Knowing that my wife's whole family
was gonna be obliterated
and that there's nothing we could do about it.
And kind of telling ourselves every step of the way
it wasn't really gonna happen.
And I really felt like, you ever watch the Ozarks?
I felt like Marty Bird.
Now, this was happening before the Ozarks,
but when I watched the Ozarks and I see that character,
the entire world is crumbling down around him
and all he can, all he did was like,
all right, what's the next step?
I watch Marty Bird and I go,
that's my fucking spirit animal.
Because you can only control what you can control.
And you can't keep Scientology from destroying your family.
And literally, it's funny, I mention this show a lot
because I watch that and I go,
that's exactly how I felt.
I talk about this six months or nine, 12 months,
whatever it was, of impending doom.
It's not like I was an emotional wreck during that time.
In private, I was, but it's not like I was just freaking out.
It was like, the sun's gonna come up tomorrow,
the world's gonna keep spinning, I can't control it,
this is hard, I can't believe this is happening.
But tomorrow's a new day.
I've never personally, even at the darkest times,
I've never experienced anything
that I would characterize as depression.
Certainly not ever any suicidal thoughts or anything.
Even in the darkest of times, and again,
this one thing I go, is it because of Scientology
or is it just me?
There really is an emotional detachment.
There almost has to be.
- And it's a cold calculation.
What are my options?
What do I do here?
- And then once I figure out the answer to that question,
I'm actually quite chipper and happy.
That's sort of my default.
You could give me six horrible options.
Once I figure out the best of those six,
I'm gonna feel like I just had a pretty good day.
- That's brilliant.
'Cause just watching Ozarks is so stressful.
- It is, right?
- So stressful watching it.
And he usually finds a way,
and usually it is a set of really bad options,
and it's one of the bad options,
but it's the best of the bad options.
- And he almost gets pissed off at everyone around him
for being so pouty about it.
(laughing)
- But you know-- - I'll never watch
that show again, same way again.
Oh, that's beautiful.
- But you know, it's like, you know,
it's still simmering there right under the surface,
like pretty damn close to the surface.
Do you know what I mean?
- Yeah, yeah.
- And people sometimes ask about recovery and whatnot,
and like, what does that look like, and what does that mean?
And it sort of goes back to kind of
the emotional detachment, is I go,
what the fuck does recovery even mean?
If you're an alcoholic and you're recovering,
you know what that means.
I used to drink, I don't drink now.
Well, I used to be in a cult, and I'm not in a cult now.
How else am I supposed to feel about this
for someone to be like, it seems like you've recovered.
What the fuck does that even mean?
Like, I'm sure some academic has an answer to that question.
I'm not someone who particularly,
I don't spend any time thinking about that.
My recovery is success,
and a little bit of trolling and revenge.
But mostly success, you know?
What does it mean to be a recovered former cult member?
What, you don't cry when people ask you about your brother?
I don't know what it means.
I've never had therapy, but not because I'm still, like,
against it from Scientology.
I just, like, I'm not gonna pay to talk to someone.
Do you know where else I could do that? Scientology.
Now, I know there's a lot of people going like, oh boy.
I know there's a lot, I'm not shitting on therapy.
I would rather have a beer with my friend
and talk about this shit
than talk to a professional for $200 an hour.
- That's the kind of therapy, yeah.
- Yeah.
- Yeah, listen, that's the part of the reason
I do this podcast, is talking to people
that you care about, that you're close with,
this is a really powerful, powerful thing.
But yeah, I don't know what recovery looks like.
And success to you is defined, just be, find happiness.
Find happiness outside the closed bubble
that defines what happiness looks like on Scientology.
- If I can make my kids happy, that's success to me.
- What advice would you give to your kids
on how to live--
- Travel the world.
- A life they can be proud of.
Travel the world?
- Travel the world.
Get rid of friends who don't push you up
and don't celebrate your success.
It's hard to give that advice to young children,
'cause kids are always so catty.
But honestly, it's like, when I see,
that really is, I just think, not just advice to my kids,
but some of the best advice to anybody.
If you've got anyone around you
who doesn't celebrate your success,
just spend less time with those people.
Surround yourself with people who actually
wanna celebrate your success and push you to succeed.
I think that's true.
I think it's even more important at a young age,
'cause if at a young age you get used to being around people
who kinda take joy in tearing you down,
then that's what you become accustomed to.
And I just think, having friends who love you
and support you is just about the closest thing
to the true meaning of life.
- And who believe in you, who believe in your potential.
And some of those ideas underlie
the good parts of Scientology.
- Yeah.
- Except there's a lot of dark parts of Scientology
that separate you from the people that believe in you
and that love you.
Well, this was a beautiful conversation.
You're a beautiful human being who came full of gifts.
And I genuinely, first of all,
you're an inspiring human being.
But most importantly, I can't wait
until I can purchase a bobblehead on the store.
So I can keep that inspiration on my desktop.
Aaron, thank you so much for talking to me.
Thank you for being you, for being brave.
I know you said you're not,
but thank you for being brave, for talking about this.
You're an inspiration and you help a lot of people.
Thank you, brother.
- Thanks for having me.
- Thanks for listening to this conversation
with Aaron Smith Levin.
To support this podcast,
please check out our sponsors in the description.
And now, let me leave you with some words
from Ralph Waldo Emerson.
Be not the slave of your own past.
Plunge into the sublime seas, dive deep and swim far.
So you will come back with new self-respect,
with new power and with an advanced experience
that will explain and overlook the old.
Thank you for listening and hope to see you next time.
(upbeat music)
(upbeat music)