← Modern Wisdom

The State Of Modern Journalism - James O'Keefe

Episode 4282022-01-28EnglishMembers only

Guests: James O'Keefe

Listen to this episode00:00 / 51:00
Reading settings
Reading preferences
Text size
Download in-depth read
Read offline

English · In-depth read · Current version

Downloads are not available yet.

Text language

In-depth read · Key ideas, reasoning, and examples, organized by topic.

§01Journalism, raids, and the cost of publication

The conversation frames James O'Keefe's work as a conflict between adversarial journalism and the institutions that hold power. The host introduces Project Veritas alongside a collapse of trust in mainstream media, while also acknowledging that undercover methods create legal, ethical, organizational, and personal dilemmas. O'Keefe accepts the adversarial label by defining journalism as publication that challenges people in power, but the interview does not establish that his methods solve the wider media problem; it presents his own account of why he thinks they are necessary.

as journalism is printing what somebody does not want printed

The FBI raid becomes the episode's central test of that theory. O'Keefe says agents seized two phones under a warrant connected to the Ashley Biden diary, while leaving his iPad and laptop. He says a judge later ordered the FBI to stop searching the phones and appointed a special master, and that the judge cited journalistic privilege. These are his descriptions of an ongoing legal dispute, not an independent finding established by the transcript.

His account of the diary illustrates a boundary he says he chose not to cross. He says he was almost certain the document belonged to Ashley Biden but lacked complete certainty about its provenance and contents, so he sought comment from Joe Biden and decided not to publish it. He contrasts that editorial decision with the later search, arguing that journalists may publish stolen material when they did not participate in the theft. The legal status of the cited case and the competing arguments from prosecutors are reported here as claims made in the interview.

Keep reading as a member.

You've read the free preview. Become a member to read the rest, with side-by-side reading and downloads where available.