← Huberman Lab

LIVE EVENT Q&A: Dr. Andrew Huberman at the Moore Theatre in Seattle

Episode 2022-08-172022-08-17EnglishMembers only
Listen to this episode00:00 / 56:04
Reading settings
Reading preferences
Text size
Download in-depth read
Read offline

English · In-depth read · Current version

Downloads are not available yet.

Text language

In-depth read · Key ideas, reasoning, and examples, organized by topic.

§01Framing the Seattle Q&A: why the question period matters

The recording opens with the host introducing himself as Andrew Huberman, a professor of neurobiology and ophthalmology at Stanford School of Medicine. He explains that he recently hosted two live events, one in Seattle, Washington, and one in Portland, Oregon, both titled The Brain-Body Contract, which covered science and science-related tools for mental health, physical health and performance. What follows in the episode is the question and answer period from the Seattle lecture.

The host calls the Q&A his favorite part of each evening because it lets him hear directly what the audience most wants to know and get into some dialogue. He describes the goal as clarifying the mechanisms behind particular tools and how best to use them for things like focus and sleep, with some discussion of mental and physical health as well.

what are the underlying mechanisms of particular tools, how best to use the tools for things like focus and sleep.

The introduction also thanks the live-event sponsors. Momentous Supplements is described as the podcast's partner, offering supplements that ship internationally in dosages and single-ingredient formulations meant to let listeners build their own supplement strategy. Inside Tracker is described as providing blood tests and DNA tests for monitoring immediate and long-term health progress. These descriptions are the sponsors' framing as read in the episode, not evaluated claims.

Two further live events are announced: Sunday, October 16th at the Wiltern Theater in Los Angeles, and Wednesday, November 9th at the Beacon Theater in New York City, with tickets listed at hubermanlab.com/tour. The introduction closes by thanking listeners for their interest in science.

§02The most-used protocols: light viewing and daily non-sleep deep rest

The first audience question asks for the most used protocol, which the answer takes to mean the protocol the speaker personally uses most. The answer names light viewing (the transcript is somewhat garbled here, mentioning both morning sunlight viewing and going to look at the sunset every evening) and, with particular emphasis, 10 to 30 minutes of some non-sleep deep rest (NSDR) protocol every day.

I absolutely do 10 to 30 minutes of some non-sleep deep rest protocol every single day.

The answer then explains the name. The speaker expresses love and "great reverence" for traditions like yoga nidra, but feared that using that label would spook people. A second motivation is a stated frustration with scientists' reliance on fancy terminology, which the speaker argues walls information off from the very public that funds the research. NSDR was meant as an umbrella term for yoga nidra and similar tools.

So I have a kind of an axe to grind with the scientific community, too.

On timing, the speaker usually does the practice in the early afternoon, or, after waking without enough or good sleep, does 30 minutes of yoga nidra first thing in the morning and reports feeling terrific afterward. This is presented as personal practice, not as a tested prescription.

The speaker traces their exposure to yoga nidra to research for an unwritten book: a week spent at a trauma and addiction treatment center in Florida, where yoga nidra and NSDR were a big part of patients' daily routine and the speaker observed what they describe as amazing transformations. That observation, more than any study cited here, is given as the reason the practice became almost religious for them. A passing mention that the CEO of Google has written about being into NSDR is explicitly downplayed ("Not that it matters"), and the speaker notes they do not know him.

§03Seasonal sunrise in Seattle and winter light

A question notes that in Seattle sunrise varies from 4:30 a.m. to 9 a.m. by season and asks whether wake-up and outdoor time should shift with the seasons. The answer is "Somewhat." Seeing the sun cross the horizon would be ideal but is not required, since not everyone can wake with the sun. The target is so-called low solar angle sunlight, justified by the yellow-blue contrast discussed earlier in the lecture (that earlier explanation is not part of this excerpt).

For people who wake before the sun is up and want to be awake, the suggestion is to turn on as many bright lights as possible. The speaker then polls the audience about feeling worse in winter or during the seasonal transition and remarks on how large the response is in the region.

The speaker links the lift people feel when spring arrives, seeing Rainier and the blossoms on campus, to dopamine. As supporting biology, the answer points to animals whose pelage (fur) is white in winter and darkens in spring and summer: the melanin pathway starts from tyrosine, which the speaker describes as the precursor both to dopamine and to melanin production in fur. The argument is that the seasonal pigment system and the dopamine system share a chemical origin.

So the whole system is linked. It's not rigged. It's linked.

The concrete recommendation for winter is 30 minutes of sunlight viewing, acknowledged as a lot but framed as better than feeling lousy all day. The other key point is catching some sunlight before the sun sets: if someone stays indoors until after dark, the speaker says, the brain and body lose track of where they are in time. The answer ends with jokes about binge-watching Ozark and about once recommending The Wire to competitors as a postdoc.

§04Fired up at night, depleted in the morning

A questioner says they go to sleep fired up and ready to do whatever it takes, but wake with that drive gone, and asks why. The speaker says they had not heard this question before and frames the reply explicitly as a guess.

The proposed explanation draws on the autonomic nervous system, described as a seesaw running from very alert, potentially panicked, to very deep sleep. In the extreme, coma is attributed to the parasympathetic system being overactive relative to the sympathetic system. The speaker suggests the questioner may simply be sleeping very deeply.

The speaker connects this to the scripts used in yoga nidra and NSDR, which guide people from "thinking and doing and predicting" to "being and feeling." The speaker translates that into plain mechanics, saying they are not mocking the phrasing: it means moving into sensation without planning. In deep parasympathetic sleep, the eyes are closed and past, present and future enter one's thinking in a deep state of relaxation, the opposite of the forward-leaning planning and predicting the questioner wants to feel on waking.

You're actually just moving into sensation but no planning, right? There's nothing mysterious about it.

Addressing the questioner as Dustin, the speaker suggests the difficulty may lie in transitioning out of such deep sleep, possibly because they are waking mid-cycle. The practical suggestion is to set an alarm for the end of a 90-minute so-called ultradian cycle; some phone sleep apps do this, though the speaker cannot recall their names. Instead of seven hours, six or seven and a half might work better. The speaker offers this as something to try, "consistent with what we know about the biology," not as a proven fix.

Keep reading as a member.

You've read the free preview. Become a member to read the rest, with side-by-side reading and downloads where available.