Facebook's week from hell, Ellen Pao on sexism in Elizabeth Holmes coverage, Newsom's win, frauds & more

The transcript opens with scrambled banter: someone asks where the others were on Thursday, one speaker says they were at home with family, and another mentions meeting a new kid who is nineteen. A few clipped lines that follow, including an intro-style fragment naming David Sachs, are too garbled to interpret reliably.

A host then welcomes listeners to episode 47 and jokes that it could have been episode 50 in three episodes. He says the plan is simply to keep recording weekly, after an event that ran over Monday and Tuesday, possibly into Wednesday.

The hosts say they recorded their first live All-In at a production board event for David Friedberg, and that it seemed to go well on an audio-visual basis. Asked for feedback, Friedberg says about half the room were scientists who had never heard the podcast and wondered what they had walked into, with a few hosts talking politics for an hour and a half and swearing.

Friedberg adds that some smoothing over was needed afterwards to make people comfortable, but that the reaction was good and the hosts were the highlight. Another speaker found it fun to do in person, and a host noted that no one walked out. Sax jokes they were more palatable to that crowd than Andrew Dice Clay.

A few lines of crosstalk about the production board and a smell are hard to follow. The clearer thread is feedback: a speaker says some viewers found the lighting and production values weak, though it looked fine at the time, and that others suspected the hosts debated each other more gently because they were in person. The speaker did not feel that, and another host felt they read each other better and had more dialogue than usual.

The group likes the idea of an evening show with a glass of wine, and one host jokes about making a Harlan 2012 a regular part of taping. The obstacle, he says, is that they tape too early on Fridays, so a happy-hour slot might suit better. Others admire the bottle, and someone floats recording after two hours of poker and wine, which another host says would not work.

One speaker judges the audio great for a first time and says that matters most because most consumption is audio. The source then breaks off into fragments about lighting on Friedberg's face; Friedberg says his wife, not the crew, got up and fixed the curtain, and a host replies that without her he would be nowhere.

Asked about the empty seat between two hosts, a speaker says it was reserved for a possible guest, but the people whose names were on the list did not arrive on time and showed up around 9 o'clock. One host says he heard the back channel involved Sky Dayton and someone else who waited outside in case they were pulled up, and the others joke about beeping out the name.

A host says Sky Dayton's last press appearance was 11 years ago, and describes him as the founder of 'earthling' (as transcribed) and Boingo, a name everyone of their generation knows. He is struck by how quickly the tech crowd moves on.

A speaker recalls a story, as told, that when Mark Andreessen first met Mark Zuckerberg, Zuckerberg did not seem to know Andreessen had created Netscape. Another says Andreessen mentioned Mosaic and was asked what that was. The conclusion offered is that people in tech worry about the future and pay little attention to history.

Asked whether they are the last generation's entrepreneurs and investors, one host says some of them are still building things, and says he recently launched a new product, whose name he cannot mention under the show's anti-promotion rules.

A speaker argues that Silicon Valley has few long careers. With asymmetric success, people have big bursts and then live differently rather than pushing into another hard entrepreneurial project, so whole generations such as web 1.0 and web 2.0 fade. He worries about this for his own kids, and says deprivation creates motivation for something as hard as starting a company; the others tease him for it.

A speaker invokes a saying attributed to Friedberg, later repeated by Elon, that starting a startup is like eating glass. His point is that building a company is very hard, so few people want to do it again once successful, and that it takes a certain deprivation to do it.

A host ties this to participation trophies and making life as easy as possible. He says one should not deprive people, yet hardship often leads to good outcomes. He calls the debate over UBI a dry run: if people believe the government will take care of them, some may never work.

A host says he could accept UBI as a safety net, but argues that paying able-bodied people not to work is anti-compassionate, because it removes the lower rungs of the ladder. In his view entry-level jobs are a stepping stone and UBI is demotivating. Another speaker adds that UBI will not pay for college, whereas Amazon will, and points to the GI bill as a case where entry-level opportunity worked as an on-ramp.

The same speaker warns that people who opt out may find it too late when they later want purpose, since restarting in your forties or fifties is hard. As an example he says he is fairly fluent in Italian, yet the last 4 or 5 percent is grueling and demotivating, and he has committed to finishing anyway.

He says biotech, which he was introduced to by Friedberg and, in his words, Nat, is a similar grind that is easy to quit. He imagines how much harder it is for someone with no success to fall back on, and another host agrees it is tough with kids screaming in the background.

Asked whether it is easier in your early twenties, a speaker answers that you have nothing, so the theory is that you are motivated to get something. Another host says he worked 10 to 16 hour days in his twenties and thirties and could not replicate that now.

He says he now does a different job, but earned that by grinding out product work, feature specs and models in his twenties as a PM, which was thankless but worth it. Another host argues that work-life balance should be judged across a whole life: working harder in your twenties lets you work less in your fifties and delegate, so telling young people they need not work hard, or paying them not to work, shortchanges them.

A speaker counters that many entry-level jobs historically paid too little. He cites companies such as McDonald's paying low wages without benefits, calling it unnecessary greed, though the transcribed figure of $70 an hour is evidently garbled.

Others trade first-job pay stories: $4.25 an hour in 1996 for cleaning a pool, minimum wage of 2.50 when one started working in 1988, and, as transcribed, 7 dollars an hour at a college bar. The jokes are largely unclear in the ASR text.

A speaker raises Larry Summers, described as a former US Secretary of the Treasury, who has warned about inflation. As the speaker tells it, giving everyone $10,000 a year would cost about $10 trillion, an estimate he gives loosely, and could push prices up, for example a burger from $0.49 to $0.99. If money is added without productivity, he says, inflation wipes out the benefit and UBI would have to be raised again.