← Acquired

Berkshire Hathaway Part II

Episode 2021-05-122021-05-12EnglishMembers only
Berkshire Hathaway Part II
Listen to this episode00:00 / 2:54:43
Reading settings
Reading preferences
Text size
Download in-depth read
Read offline

English · In-depth read · Current version

Downloads are not available yet.

Text language

In-depth read · Key ideas, reasoning, and examples, organized by topic.

§01A partnership dissolved, a new investing philosophy begins

The episode picks up in 1969, after Warren Buffett closed his partnership in his best-performing year and returned investors' capital. The next phase is framed as a transition from buying “cigar butts”—cheap businesses with little value left—to owning wonderful businesses for the long term. The declining textile maker Berkshire Hathaway becomes the vehicle for that transition. The hosts organize the story around two questions: why Buffett resumed investing after winding down the partnership, and why he chose to do so inside Berkshire rather than launch another fund. They also signal that the business's complex corporate structure and Buffett's brief leadership of Salomon Brothers will test the reputation he had built.

Charlie Munger enters the story as both a close counterpart and an intellectual contrast. His grandfather's advice—to focus on the task in front of him and control spending—shaped his early ideas about wealth. Like Buffett, Munger wanted financial independence, but he described the goal in terms of being like John Maynard Keynes, while Buffett is characterized as wanting no one to tell him what to do. Munger's reading, especially of Benjamin Franklin, taught him to learn from “the eminent dead.” The hosts connect these habits to a disciplined, self-directed temperament, but this opening biography does not yet show how those traits changed Berkshire's investment decisions.

Their ambition also differed in its social dimension. Buffett is described as measuring success through the wealth he would accumulate, while Munger wanted to become a prominent figure in a city where he could rise into its leading circles. After studying mathematics, physics, and engineering and serving in the Air Force, Munger went to Harvard Law despite not having an undergraduate degree. He chose Los Angeles partly for its opportunities and its scale: a large, growing city that still seemed open to becoming someone important. The contrast gives the partnership a useful tension—shared interest in wealth creation, but different ideas about status and the life they wanted around it.

The hosts recount the death of Munger's nine-year-old son Teddy from leukemia in 1955, when effective treatment was unavailable. They describe Munger as devastated but determined to set new goals rather than let grief consume him. His formulation—that one should not let a tragedy multiply through a failure of will—is presented as characteristic of his resolve, while Ben cautions that such advice depends on an unusual capacity for compartmentalization. Munger then set goals to marry again and diversify beyond law. His practical search led him to Nancy Borthwick, and their blended family eventually included eight children. The episode uses these details to show Munger's forceful, idiosyncratic personality; it does not claim the family story itself explains his later investing results.

§02From partnership investing to a different idea of a great business

Before Munger became a full-time investor, he built wealth through law, equity compensation, and Southern California real estate. By the early 1960s, his net worth was about $1.5 million, roughly comparable to Buffett's. Their ambitions had a different social texture: Buffett is portrayed as focused on financial independence and the “scoreboard” of wealth, while Munger wanted to rise among the prominent people of a growing city. The distinction helps explain why Munger found Los Angeles attractive, but the hosts do not claim that social status itself drove his investment decisions.

A 1959 dinner in Omaha became the catalyst for their partnership. The Davises introduced Munger to Buffett, who was then managing seven or eight separate partnerships from a spare bedroom, without charging fees or taking a salary. Munger asked whether he could build a similar investment practice in California; Buffett, unusually direct, said he thought Munger could. Munger returned to Los Angeles, continued practicing law while raising capital, and later left his firm to manage partnerships full time. Susie Buffett described their mutual respect as unusually strong: each thought the other was the smartest person he had ever met. That relationship would give Buffett a trusted critic as well as a partner.

Keep reading as a member.

You've read the free preview. Become a member to read the rest, with side-by-side reading and downloads where available.